Active Users:511 Time:01/03/2026 01:35:16 PM
Not at all. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 10/11/2011 12:09:09 AM
I've verified these various ciphers up to now, all the automated ones anyway, but I'm not clear on your last step here, which is also the most important... I'd also suggest shorter ciphering in the future

And lastly we have Yunalesca's accusation of me. Using my own table of letters and their corresponding post ID numbers, "F1B2D1C1D2D1F2F2U2Y1R2P1A1F1I2N2K2" ends up as "954601286642291751166149129175229175195460295460221363223865119170234965143101954601135232162402151342" which is what I claimed.

It is the encryption method I used for coding the keyword on Day 1, which can be found here.

The final table for that was

A = 4310
B = 28664
C = 166149
D = 29175
E = 29562
F = 95460
G = 11832
H = 30953
I = 13523
J = 32018
K = 15134
L = 60285
M = 15924
N = 16240
O = 98398
P = 34965
Q = 119918
R = 19170
S = 19726
T = 20520
U = 21363
V = 37479
W = 163142
X = 142433
Y = 23865
Z = 122651

So, starting with "F1B2D1C1D2D1F2F2U2Y1R2P1A1F1I2N2K2"

Looking at the table, the first character, F, becomes 95460.

Then we have the number 1, which, as with all of the other coding methods, remains as 1.

Thus, my encoded message begins 954601.

F1 is followed by B2, so looking at the table again, we see that B becomes 28664. As was the case with 1, 2 remains 2.

Thus, my enconded message begins 954601286642.

And so on.

As for having shorter ciphers in the future... we'll see. As you will recall, I was against this from the beginning, and I didn't want to make it easy on anyone. I had no intentions of ever actually claiming anyway, but we all saw how that turned out.

Also, I may have an ulterior motive for using codes of increasing complexity that will culminate in a devious scheme in some future game.

Or then again, I may not. :P
Reply to message
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended - 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM 1445 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ? - 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM 1294 Views
Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM* - 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM 549 Views
Voting record: - 07/11/2011 05:25:40 PM 1194 Views
Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 02:52:26 PM 999 Views
Re: Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 03:36:31 PM 1168 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it - 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM 1136 Views
... and the two things - 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM 1146 Views
I object to this plan. - 07/11/2011 02:07:35 AM 1041 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM 936 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM 1060 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM 973 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought - 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM 976 Views
Yes *NM* - 07/11/2011 08:41:04 PM 537 Views
and follow that to the logical conclusion... - 07/11/2011 08:40:43 PM 1223 Views
no *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM 561 Views
FT already banned it *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM 540 Views
I know, I'm just voicing my opinion *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:27:34 PM 461 Views
Besides the ban, I can't see why you'd object - 07/11/2011 06:44:14 PM 1014 Views
errrm, i don't think no is a strong enough word for this *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:58:09 PM 659 Views
? will be replacing Kronin... - 07/11/2011 01:56:08 AM 1014 Views
Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM 1172 Views
Re: Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:42:15 PM 1322 Views
I'll echo that vote. - 07/11/2011 06:15:21 PM 1185 Views
He could have just been being polite - 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM 1364 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday - 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM 1125 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own - 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM 1065 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want... - 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM 1027 Views
No, I don't want you to claim - 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM 959 Views
Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM 975 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:23 PM 1031 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:09:04 PM 1003 Views
I oh got confused. - 08/11/2011 02:41:46 AM 1066 Views
That is not the case against Kronin. - 07/11/2011 09:48:52 PM 879 Views
I don't think substitution is enough - 07/11/2011 10:25:27 PM 1120 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM 521 Views
Ignore the *NM* *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:43:16 PM 508 Views
doubly so... - 07/11/2011 06:49:05 PM 1153 Views
out of what? *NM* - 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM 503 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin - 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM 1108 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM 1048 Views
Re: I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 09:39:45 PM 1115 Views
Heh. Die? Die! His username makes that weird. *NM* - 08/11/2011 10:55:22 PM 557 Views
eh - 08/11/2011 10:40:47 PM 1080 Views
What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 02:32:14 PM 1073 Views
Re: What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 08:38:19 PM 1075 Views
Semi-RBIRL - 09/11/2011 05:26:11 AM 996 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM 1191 Views
RC decode - 09/11/2011 10:35:52 PM 1142 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well - 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM 1053 Views
All right, let's proceed sanely then - 09/11/2011 10:51:12 PM 1031 Views
OK, Unvote - 09/11/2011 11:23:35 PM 935 Views
decoding: - 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM 1078 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step? - 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM 1029 Views
Not at all. - 10/11/2011 12:09:09 AM 1034 Views
Okay I confirm your decode then - 10/11/2011 12:16:22 AM 1020 Views
... *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:59:58 PM 598 Views
Woah. Problems. - 09/11/2011 11:32:40 PM 969 Views
there is something really fishy going on... *NM* - 09/11/2011 11:34:09 PM 515 Views
what? - 09/11/2011 11:32:45 PM 853 Views
Re: what? - 09/11/2011 11:34:16 PM 917 Views
Actually, there's a strong chance neither is lying - 09/11/2011 11:53:35 PM 1232 Views
So, what now? - 10/11/2011 12:49:12 AM 1296 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table) - 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM 1090 Views
I am not a cop. *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:04:38 AM 439 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande. - 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM 1014 Views
EBWOP: here's the code. - 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM 883 Views
Decode confirmed - 10/11/2011 02:08:26 AM 915 Views
Yeah, forgot to say I used Vignere. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:18:31 AM 524 Views
EBWOP again - 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM 864 Views
Stand by for the moment - 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM 1042 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting. - 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM 1045 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too - 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM 1107 Views
It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:18:02 AM 1011 Views
Re: It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:30:00 AM 1336 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM 560 Views
We still need you role decode *NM* - 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM 473 Views
(I did, in my other message) - 10/11/2011 07:18:43 PM 850 Views
Okay, got ya, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:02:55 PM 535 Views
i am a cop - 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM 897 Views
and my decode - 10/11/2011 07:14:38 PM 1037 Views
Yep, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:06:16 PM 554 Views
Also, which ? did you check? - 10/11/2011 08:08:05 PM 950 Views
original ? - 10/11/2011 08:10:30 PM 1040 Views
Thanks *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:11:13 PM 475 Views
Not a cop *NM* - 10/11/2011 11:48:27 PM 727 Views
To the decode-mobile! *plays 60s Batman music* - 11/11/2011 02:32:06 PM 955 Views
Let's take another look at that poem - 10/11/2011 01:44:36 AM 1141 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane. - 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM 1125 Views
FT IS insane. Turns out I was missing something after all. *NM* - 10/11/2011 09:59:56 PM 447 Views
OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 02:23:10 PM 1097 Views
Re: OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 05:52:25 PM 1155 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC - 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM 986 Views
Sure... - 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM 1213 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way - 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM 1196 Views
I have been nominated! - 10/11/2011 10:30:37 PM 1088 Views
Thanks - 10/11/2011 10:36:36 PM 1132 Views
My pleasure *NM* - 10/11/2011 10:44:23 PM 446 Views
*NM* - 10/11/2011 11:21:59 PM 480 Views
Not saying that that is right of course... - 10/11/2011 11:23:23 PM 1032 Views
Hmm... - 10/11/2011 11:20:50 PM 886 Views
I totally agree. - 10/11/2011 09:54:25 PM 945 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched - 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM 1075 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM 477 Views
Which I didn't do *NM* - 11/11/2011 02:05:30 AM 521 Views
I know, I know. - 11/11/2011 03:57:51 AM 938 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM 553 Views
I hadn't performed one yet. - 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM 1044 Views
Isaac - 11/11/2011 02:00:18 AM 1133 Views
Or me - 11/11/2011 02:07:10 AM 1043 Views
I'd recommend ? - 11/11/2011 02:15:24 AM 901 Views
Bring it. - 11/11/2011 03:10:14 AM 946 Views
Someone who has already been copped - 11/11/2011 03:57:08 AM 898 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop - 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM 929 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna - 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM 1193 Views
no i'm not, im a normal cop *NM* - 11/11/2011 09:18:23 PM 562 Views
I had everything messed up anyway *NM* - 12/11/2011 10:45:54 PM 498 Views
Vote: Beetnemisis/RBIRL - 11/11/2011 02:04:35 AM 966 Views
Hey people sorry for the unexpected RBIRL - 11/11/2011 11:47:11 AM 1143 Views
RBIRL here too. - 11/11/2011 01:34:45 PM 899 Views
I'm thinking either Hieshyn or ? - 11/11/2011 04:32:16 PM 1018 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table) - 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM 1233 Views
Fox investigated ? and found him innocent *NM* - 11/11/2011 10:41:39 PM 474 Views
Vote: ? - 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM 907 Views
Yeah, that seems logical next step, Vote: ? - 13/11/2011 02:59:25 AM 1244 Views
mrr, vote ? then *NM* - 13/11/2011 10:27:49 AM 648 Views
Think my vote was on ? already. - 13/11/2011 04:26:49 PM 1066 Views
Vote: ? *NM* - 14/11/2011 02:27:20 AM 600 Views
That should be lynch with yours, so... - 14/11/2011 03:07:36 AM 964 Views
? Has been lynched - 14/11/2011 03:50:31 AM 1131 Views
Game ends. - 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM 995 Views
Role list: - 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM 1035 Views
Jeeez. - 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM 1004 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM 494 Views
Not even cause tracker is still the odd man out. - 15/11/2011 12:20:17 AM 998 Views
That might have worked but everyone would have had targets - 15/11/2011 02:20:43 AM 1108 Views
Maybe, but I still would have known he was guilty. *NM* - 15/11/2011 02:55:43 AM 466 Views
You were paranoid, amusingly enough. - 15/11/2011 02:59:43 AM 1011 Views
Ya there was no hope for us *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:04:06 AM 501 Views
YAY! - 14/11/2011 10:48:54 PM 992 Views
Wow. *NM* - 15/11/2011 01:09:28 AM 547 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator - 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM 873 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system - 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM 1128 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs - 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM 1046 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players. - 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM 1012 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in - 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM 987 Views
Nope I'm not ready to mod yet... - 15/11/2011 08:29:24 PM 908 Views
hey - 15/11/2011 09:46:28 PM 869 Views
It's Hieshyn's if he wants it, otherwise I can go next. - 15/11/2011 12:40:13 PM 1041 Views
I'm not ready to go next - 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM 1125 Views
Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM 897 Views
Re: Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 04:09:07 PM 1060 Views
Deathless Mafia? Is that a thing? SQUEE, Mistborn! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:15:49 PM 448 Views
If it wasn't a thing before, it is now! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:53:14 PM 456 Views
ooooh - 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM 911 Views
You've got a week to read the last 2....GO, GO, GO!! *NM* - 15/11/2011 11:43:21 PM 492 Views
hah! i could read both in two days - 16/11/2011 07:56:58 PM 957 Views
Just for you, the game shall be spoiler free! *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:12:24 AM 450 Views
Speaking of which, any timeline yet? - 19/11/2011 07:25:11 PM 948 Views
Sounds fantastic - 16/11/2011 12:10:06 AM 1102 Views
That could also be fantastic. *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:13:29 AM 494 Views
I AM ALL SORTS OF PUMPED. *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:38 PM 515 Views
Though may or may not actually be playing... *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:58 PM 459 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding - 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM 1239 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea. - 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM 1348 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM 1149 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:36:38 AM 1040 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM 1370 Views
I really didn't like it either. - 16/11/2011 06:20:33 PM 997 Views
I liked my plan: Random voting ftw! *NM* - 16/11/2011 06:29:07 PM 505 Views

Reply to Message