Active Users:704 Time:18/12/2025 06:23:12 PM
Yeah, that seems logical next step, Vote: ? Isaac Send a noteboard - 13/11/2011 02:59:25 AM
After a lengthy hiatus while we discussed our plethora of cops, my vote is back where it began.

Unvote though I think I already did, and Vote: ?


Agreed, I think the natural format for this game was probably an assumption that on Day 2 someone would claim cop, even if just to avoid lynch though more likely as I did, knowing HC would be impossible and odds of night 2 NK would be decent. Once one person claimed the exposure of the cop madness would be guaranteed since there's pretty much no plausible series of NKs/lynches that wouldn't have left multiple Daycop and normal cops around. Thus, the natural form I think would be an assumption the scum would be able to fake claim cop... our day 1 coded RC's beats that, and I note FT even posted in while we were doing those with what could be viewed as an attempt to discourage it, so I think ? and Hieshyn are our baddies, or maybe just one of them as we might have SK/cult only options.

I've kicked around options for how they might be scum faked cop claims and the only one that seems plausible is someone really ramped themselves up to crack at least to or three RC's before posting their own, I know you and I aren't the only ones with some background in this, but I'm not seeing it, I was second RC post less than an hour after the first one, Beet's coded Daycop claim, and most rolled in fairly quickly. I suppose it's possible as one of the late one's you might have cracked some, seen the pattern, and gone for it but I doubt that. And I can't think of anyone else with a known strong cipher background besides you and me, so they can always lynch you down the road if ? and Hiehsyn come up clean assuming someone doesn't NK you before then... and I'm only bringing up the option of possible cracking in case I get whacked tonight :P No, I think this one is clear cut now and if it isn't it's likely to be weird in a way we can't guess at yet anyway, maybe more poem stanzas will help if that's the case... and I think we should just get the lynch over with, if ? dies a scum, then we know what to do, if not we'll need to re-examine everything anyway. I don't think code-cracking was very likely, considering the small timeline to do it in, but I wouldn't rule it out... that's the only thing that makes me a touch nervous though, it was undeniably possible, at least for some of those codes, Vigenere's tough to crack with short ciphertext so I'm not seeing that, I already had a go at Kronin's to see if it matched ?'s, but no luck, I'd love to see that one cracked before offing ? but it's probably a vanilla claim with some padding and there's really no result of that being cracked that makes ? look better, only worse if it cracked as something non-vanilla, and we've got evidence enough to lynch anyway.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended - 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM 1396 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ? - 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM 1250 Views
Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM* - 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM 524 Views
Voting record: - 07/11/2011 05:25:40 PM 1152 Views
Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 02:52:26 PM 957 Views
Re: Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 03:36:31 PM 1123 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it - 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM 1092 Views
... and the two things - 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM 1102 Views
I object to this plan. - 07/11/2011 02:07:35 AM 999 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM 888 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM 1018 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM 931 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought - 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM 923 Views
Yes *NM* - 07/11/2011 08:41:04 PM 514 Views
and follow that to the logical conclusion... - 07/11/2011 08:40:43 PM 1176 Views
no *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM 542 Views
FT already banned it *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM 519 Views
I know, I'm just voicing my opinion *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:27:34 PM 441 Views
Besides the ban, I can't see why you'd object - 07/11/2011 06:44:14 PM 961 Views
errrm, i don't think no is a strong enough word for this *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:58:09 PM 640 Views
? will be replacing Kronin... - 07/11/2011 01:56:08 AM 962 Views
Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM 1135 Views
Re: Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:42:15 PM 1283 Views
I'll echo that vote. - 07/11/2011 06:15:21 PM 1137 Views
He could have just been being polite - 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM 1329 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday - 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM 1097 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own - 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM 1017 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want... - 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM 983 Views
No, I don't want you to claim - 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM 906 Views
Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM 930 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:23 PM 985 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:09:04 PM 958 Views
I oh got confused. - 08/11/2011 02:41:46 AM 1020 Views
That is not the case against Kronin. - 07/11/2011 09:48:52 PM 835 Views
I don't think substitution is enough - 07/11/2011 10:25:27 PM 1088 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM 499 Views
Ignore the *NM* *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:43:16 PM 492 Views
doubly so... - 07/11/2011 06:49:05 PM 1110 Views
out of what? *NM* - 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM 484 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin - 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM 1073 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM 1007 Views
Re: I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 09:39:45 PM 1069 Views
Heh. Die? Die! His username makes that weird. *NM* - 08/11/2011 10:55:22 PM 535 Views
eh - 08/11/2011 10:40:47 PM 1035 Views
What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 02:32:14 PM 1031 Views
Re: What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 08:38:19 PM 1039 Views
Semi-RBIRL - 09/11/2011 05:26:11 AM 955 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM 1154 Views
RC decode - 09/11/2011 10:35:52 PM 1094 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well - 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM 997 Views
All right, let's proceed sanely then - 09/11/2011 10:51:12 PM 984 Views
OK, Unvote - 09/11/2011 11:23:35 PM 900 Views
decoding: - 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM 1035 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step? - 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM 992 Views
Not at all. - 10/11/2011 12:09:09 AM 994 Views
Okay I confirm your decode then - 10/11/2011 12:16:22 AM 979 Views
... *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:59:58 PM 577 Views
Woah. Problems. - 09/11/2011 11:32:40 PM 922 Views
there is something really fishy going on... *NM* - 09/11/2011 11:34:09 PM 496 Views
what? - 09/11/2011 11:32:45 PM 806 Views
Re: what? - 09/11/2011 11:34:16 PM 876 Views
Actually, there's a strong chance neither is lying - 09/11/2011 11:53:35 PM 1188 Views
So, what now? - 10/11/2011 12:49:12 AM 1254 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table) - 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM 1044 Views
I am not a cop. *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:04:38 AM 419 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande. - 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM 978 Views
EBWOP: here's the code. - 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM 839 Views
Decode confirmed - 10/11/2011 02:08:26 AM 875 Views
Yeah, forgot to say I used Vignere. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:18:31 AM 500 Views
EBWOP again - 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM 815 Views
Stand by for the moment - 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM 1006 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting. - 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM 1007 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too - 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM 1067 Views
It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:18:02 AM 967 Views
Re: It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:30:00 AM 1297 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM 540 Views
We still need you role decode *NM* - 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM 457 Views
(I did, in my other message) - 10/11/2011 07:18:43 PM 817 Views
Okay, got ya, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:02:55 PM 511 Views
i am a cop - 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM 853 Views
and my decode - 10/11/2011 07:14:38 PM 989 Views
Yep, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:06:16 PM 532 Views
Also, which ? did you check? - 10/11/2011 08:08:05 PM 909 Views
original ? - 10/11/2011 08:10:30 PM 1006 Views
Thanks *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:11:13 PM 451 Views
Not a cop *NM* - 10/11/2011 11:48:27 PM 701 Views
To the decode-mobile! *plays 60s Batman music* - 11/11/2011 02:32:06 PM 903 Views
Let's take another look at that poem - 10/11/2011 01:44:36 AM 1094 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane. - 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM 1076 Views
FT IS insane. Turns out I was missing something after all. *NM* - 10/11/2011 09:59:56 PM 427 Views
OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 02:23:10 PM 1049 Views
Re: OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 05:52:25 PM 1123 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC - 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM 948 Views
Sure... - 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM 1167 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way - 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM 1149 Views
I have been nominated! - 10/11/2011 10:30:37 PM 1041 Views
Thanks - 10/11/2011 10:36:36 PM 1092 Views
My pleasure *NM* - 10/11/2011 10:44:23 PM 425 Views
*NM* - 10/11/2011 11:21:59 PM 462 Views
Not saying that that is right of course... - 10/11/2011 11:23:23 PM 995 Views
Hmm... - 10/11/2011 11:20:50 PM 840 Views
I totally agree. - 10/11/2011 09:54:25 PM 901 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched - 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM 1030 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM 456 Views
Which I didn't do *NM* - 11/11/2011 02:05:30 AM 505 Views
I know, I know. - 11/11/2011 03:57:51 AM 888 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM 535 Views
I hadn't performed one yet. - 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM 991 Views
Isaac - 11/11/2011 02:00:18 AM 1102 Views
Or me - 11/11/2011 02:07:10 AM 1006 Views
I'd recommend ? - 11/11/2011 02:15:24 AM 862 Views
Bring it. - 11/11/2011 03:10:14 AM 900 Views
Someone who has already been copped - 11/11/2011 03:57:08 AM 856 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop - 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM 873 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna - 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM 1151 Views
no i'm not, im a normal cop *NM* - 11/11/2011 09:18:23 PM 545 Views
I had everything messed up anyway *NM* - 12/11/2011 10:45:54 PM 476 Views
Vote: Beetnemisis/RBIRL - 11/11/2011 02:04:35 AM 921 Views
Hey people sorry for the unexpected RBIRL - 11/11/2011 11:47:11 AM 1107 Views
RBIRL here too. - 11/11/2011 01:34:45 PM 858 Views
I'm thinking either Hieshyn or ? - 11/11/2011 04:32:16 PM 982 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table) - 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM 1197 Views
Fox investigated ? and found him innocent *NM* - 11/11/2011 10:41:39 PM 459 Views
Vote: ? - 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM 864 Views
Yeah, that seems logical next step, Vote: ? - 13/11/2011 02:59:25 AM 1210 Views
mrr, vote ? then *NM* - 13/11/2011 10:27:49 AM 628 Views
Think my vote was on ? already. - 13/11/2011 04:26:49 PM 1026 Views
Vote: ? *NM* - 14/11/2011 02:27:20 AM 578 Views
That should be lynch with yours, so... - 14/11/2011 03:07:36 AM 916 Views
? Has been lynched - 14/11/2011 03:50:31 AM 1092 Views
Game ends. - 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM 953 Views
Role list: - 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM 993 Views
Jeeez. - 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM 964 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM 475 Views
Not even cause tracker is still the odd man out. - 15/11/2011 12:20:17 AM 958 Views
That might have worked but everyone would have had targets - 15/11/2011 02:20:43 AM 1057 Views
Maybe, but I still would have known he was guilty. *NM* - 15/11/2011 02:55:43 AM 446 Views
You were paranoid, amusingly enough. - 15/11/2011 02:59:43 AM 963 Views
Ya there was no hope for us *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:04:06 AM 476 Views
YAY! - 14/11/2011 10:48:54 PM 945 Views
Wow. *NM* - 15/11/2011 01:09:28 AM 528 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator - 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM 834 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system - 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM 1081 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs - 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM 1001 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players. - 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM 967 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in - 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM 943 Views
Nope I'm not ready to mod yet... - 15/11/2011 08:29:24 PM 876 Views
hey - 15/11/2011 09:46:28 PM 830 Views
It's Hieshyn's if he wants it, otherwise I can go next. - 15/11/2011 12:40:13 PM 1000 Views
I'm not ready to go next - 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM 1078 Views
Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM 849 Views
Re: Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 04:09:07 PM 1024 Views
Deathless Mafia? Is that a thing? SQUEE, Mistborn! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:15:49 PM 428 Views
If it wasn't a thing before, it is now! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:53:14 PM 434 Views
ooooh - 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM 872 Views
You've got a week to read the last 2....GO, GO, GO!! *NM* - 15/11/2011 11:43:21 PM 470 Views
hah! i could read both in two days - 16/11/2011 07:56:58 PM 906 Views
Just for you, the game shall be spoiler free! *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:12:24 AM 430 Views
Speaking of which, any timeline yet? - 19/11/2011 07:25:11 PM 901 Views
Sounds fantastic - 16/11/2011 12:10:06 AM 1065 Views
That could also be fantastic. *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:13:29 AM 472 Views
I AM ALL SORTS OF PUMPED. *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:38 PM 497 Views
Though may or may not actually be playing... *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:58 PM 440 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding - 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM 1192 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea. - 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM 1298 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM 1106 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:36:38 AM 988 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM 1328 Views
I really didn't like it either. - 16/11/2011 06:20:33 PM 961 Views
I liked my plan: Random voting ftw! *NM* - 16/11/2011 06:29:07 PM 485 Views

Reply to Message