Basically, we have three things going on.
First, White Flame. He may well be a DF, he has claimed Green, so let's be blunt, he has a warder, the odds he doesn't are slim to none a green wouldn't when we have five people claiming not to be AS in a tower-centered game.
First off, I am not his warder either. Though I would point out that it's quite possible that Aes Sedai and warder are not aware of each other, or that there's only one bonded pair in the game, similar to a mason group. I'm just saying, it's a possibility.
Whoever our cop is, and I'm not denying the possibility I am with that comment nor saying I am, that cop needs to know that if a warder steps forward for WF, then either WF or that warder need to be investigated tonight.
This sounds like a good plan to me.
Last, the doc, whoever that is and again it may be me or may not, actually needs to protect me tonight, I'm the only confirmed lightsider even if I don't much care for how that happened, so I'm target #1. The DFs may go after me anyway, anticipating the doc might not, but either way that's the best option for the doc. Little self-centered sounding but true.
Hehehe, it is still difficult for me to accept that you are 100% definitely not a Darkfriend, but the proof is out there, so I guess I have to overcome my prejudice.
But anyway, that sounds like a good plan as well. So, before we proceed to go after WF, let's see if someone steps forward as warder knowing that either they or WF will be investigated tonight.
That's what I think would be most logical, thoughts?
Insert theme music here.
Mafia Day one
- 30/08/2009 10:53:04 AM
3086 Views
Vote tally
- 30/08/2009 11:10:18 AM
1668 Views
Tee hee hee.
- 30/08/2009 11:18:09 AM
1708 Views
OMGUS - Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 30/08/2009 03:03:21 PM
957 Views
All right - new usernames (table)
- 30/08/2009 03:35:59 PM
1669 Views
Alrighty!!
- 30/08/2009 05:42:17 PM
1655 Views
You should have changed you name to....
- 30/08/2009 06:52:46 PM
1725 Views
Haha
- 30/08/2009 07:18:10 PM
1623 Views
Well, I confirm that, I'm an Aes Sedai
- 30/08/2009 08:37:32 PM
1572 Views
What I really think we should do....
- 30/08/2009 08:49:04 PM
1664 Views
Okay, that's a bad idea
- 30/08/2009 08:52:42 PM
1604 Views
So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:16:17 PM
1639 Views
Re: So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:24:22 PM
1686 Views
Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:27:29 PM
1653 Views
Re: Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:42:16 PM
1660 Views
See, now that we have others....
- 30/08/2009 10:09:00 PM
1556 Views
No way, me too.
- 30/08/2009 11:15:01 PM
1574 Views
Well, I might as well say it
- 31/08/2009 12:20:58 AM
1613 Views
Maybe we should just lynch Isaac.
- 30/08/2009 07:32:50 PM
1703 Views
Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:29:01 PM
1612 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:57:17 PM
1543 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 09:01:20 PM
1573 Views
I'm going to facepalm
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1544 Views
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1544 Views
LOL, you miss the point
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1641 Views
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1641 Views
How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 09:30:14 PM
1578 Views
Re: How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 10:02:33 PM
1720 Views
Do you mean that since you can't lie, saying you're for the Tower proves your goodness?
- 31/08/2009 01:44:01 AM
1486 Views
BTW
- 30/08/2009 08:43:16 PM
1649 Views
I would suggest you do it anyway so they're at least saved on this site. *NM*
- 30/08/2009 10:07:26 PM
990 Views
I just sent myself the saved copy I had.
- 30/08/2009 10:17:46 PM
1621 Views
Howdy
- 31/08/2009 04:42:47 PM
1528 Views
I still can't see the fuss over Isaac's post
- 31/08/2009 05:25:14 PM
1616 Views
It was a misunderstanding, I think
- 31/08/2009 06:07:54 PM
1573 Views
^Read this^ Rather than the long discussion by Isaac and F-T
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
854 Views
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
854 Views
See, that looks pretty bad for you.
- 31/08/2009 07:37:28 PM
1553 Views
I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:49:45 PM
1531 Views
Re: I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:50:00 PM
1650 Views
? Never double-posted that way before *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:15:21 PM
909 Views
Congratulations of discovering new and exciting ways for us to embarrass ourselves
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
858 Views
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
858 Views
Well,
- 31/08/2009 09:00:47 PM
1489 Views
He said it was suspicious saying "For the Tower" as opposed to "For the Light".
- 31/08/2009 09:13:25 PM
1552 Views
It does look suspicous at this point....
- 31/08/2009 09:54:56 PM
1560 Views
I see what you mean but hardly agree with it
- 01/09/2009 02:05:07 AM
1561 Views
It's the best we've got right now.
- 01/09/2009 02:44:20 AM
1491 Views
I've done so much today. Hours of engineering and chem...again. *NM*
- 01/09/2009 02:57:08 AM
942 Views
I'm here
- 31/08/2009 06:16:40 PM
1479 Views
What's with everyone switching their usernames to their real names? lol *NM*
- 31/08/2009 08:51:23 PM
905 Views
Might as well move along
- 01/09/2009 12:36:28 AM
1586 Views
Okay.
- 01/09/2009 02:50:21 PM
1581 Views
Well, WF has had two days to reply, but hasn't even tried to defend himself.
- 01/09/2009 03:24:11 PM
1635 Views
I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 03:45:31 PM
1541 Views
Re: I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 07:23:00 PM
1489 Views
Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:26:29 PM
1555 Views
Re: Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:36:31 PM
1488 Views
I don't want a repeat of Game 2.
- 01/09/2009 07:50:57 PM
1576 Views
This is a good point.
- 01/09/2009 08:06:24 PM
1598 Views
As soon as he starts getting accused...
- 01/09/2009 09:49:14 PM
1505 Views
What you did was suspicious
- 01/09/2009 09:50:56 PM
1506 Views
I wish wotmania were still alive....
- 01/09/2009 10:06:03 PM
1538 Views
Yeah, and we cut you slack because you were a newbie.
- 01/09/2009 10:10:34 PM
1544 Views
Oh, well...
- 01/09/2009 10:53:57 PM
1479 Views
Well...it doesn't change what your doing
- 01/09/2009 11:02:48 PM
1502 Views
to avoid loads of editing
- 01/09/2009 09:22:36 PM
1634 Views
All right, I think we need to throw in the towel
- 01/09/2009 09:33:04 PM
1612 Views
nuts
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1574 Views
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1574 Views
Re: nuts
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1651 Views
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1651 Views
*sigh*
- 01/09/2009 10:27:57 PM
1537 Views
I still don't think we need to quit.
- 01/09/2009 10:31:30 PM
1594 Views
Guess I'll vote for White Flame as well.
- 01/09/2009 11:46:00 PM
1663 Views
Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 07:21:56 AM
1478 Views
Re: Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 06:58:22 PM
1577 Views
I think you should probably claim.
- 02/09/2009 08:24:02 PM
1465 Views
I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 09:42:48 PM
1466 Views
Re: I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 11:08:44 PM
1475 Views
Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 03:24:43 AM
1547 Views
Who are your warders?
- 02/09/2009 11:10:28 PM
1546 Views
My claim
- 03/09/2009 05:04:26 PM
1606 Views
Ok....
- 03/09/2009 05:08:25 PM
1423 Views
It doesn't sound that outlandish to me.
- 03/09/2009 07:11:06 PM
1492 Views
Nor I, but we now have some definite leads to work with
- 04/09/2009 05:13:18 AM
1542 Views
I'm not a warder
- 04/09/2009 01:01:27 PM
1482 Views
All right, the advised day 1 strategy
- 03/09/2009 01:18:09 AM
1568 Views
Sounds Good to Me
- 03/09/2009 02:14:41 AM
1557 Views
the situation so far
- 04/09/2009 06:02:36 PM
1500 Views
Can you keep some kind of constant form for the vote counts?
- 04/09/2009 06:11:53 PM
1506 Views

*NM*