Re: Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 04:57:54 AM
It's hard when you're anti-day 1 lynch like I am. (I'm not getting into another discussion on this, FT). I'd elaborate but I'd be opening my mouth like I told myself not to. 

Day 1 No Lynch is a perfectly decent tactic, whenever your odds of lynching are roughly the same as random it makes sense, personally I'm against it today though.
You gain nothing, and lose something.
A day 1 no lynch has advantages, when you have no viable target to lynch, much like hypocopping it can hurt or help, depending on various factors. Personally, I'm against a no lynch today, that doesn't change the fact that sometimes it makes sense. The best thing you can get out of townie near-random lynch on day 1 is a vote record to use on the DFs later. I really can't think of a case where a random day 1 lynch benefited the town.
You do gain something too, the town has a cop, the cop can make an investigation, about 1 in 3 the cop IDs a DF, that alternate is he clears someone.
Which we only learn if the cop reveals himself. But never mind that, there is never real evidence for anybody on Day 1. Sometimes people think they are, but that can lead to cases like the lynching of Delmaradrid Saighan in whatever number game that was.
More often than not, players enter the second day with no better clues, and one less Lightsider. In case of a random lynch, at least there's a voting record to go by, and the reactions to it. And you're no worse off, because even if you do lynch a Lightsider, it doesn't actually reduce your number of chances at lynching a Darkfriend, as I demonstrated to Fox and Ravens last time.
Ultimately, it's the number of chances you get at lynching Darkfriends that counts, not the number of Lightsiders you have. If you only get two chances at finding the Darkfriend, it doesn't matter if you have five or five thousand Lightsiders - you still only get two chances. Heck, less might be better, because your probabilities are higher.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Mafia Day one
- 30/08/2009 10:53:04 AM
3084 Views
Vote tally
- 30/08/2009 11:10:18 AM
1666 Views
Tee hee hee.
- 30/08/2009 11:18:09 AM
1706 Views
OMGUS - Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 30/08/2009 03:03:21 PM
957 Views
All right - new usernames (table)
- 30/08/2009 03:35:59 PM
1667 Views
Alrighty!!
- 30/08/2009 05:42:17 PM
1652 Views
You should have changed you name to....
- 30/08/2009 06:52:46 PM
1724 Views
Haha
- 30/08/2009 07:18:10 PM
1621 Views
Well, I confirm that, I'm an Aes Sedai
- 30/08/2009 08:37:32 PM
1571 Views
What I really think we should do....
- 30/08/2009 08:49:04 PM
1662 Views
Okay, that's a bad idea
- 30/08/2009 08:52:42 PM
1601 Views
So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:16:17 PM
1637 Views
Re: So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:24:22 PM
1684 Views
Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:27:29 PM
1651 Views
Re: Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:42:16 PM
1660 Views
See, now that we have others....
- 30/08/2009 10:09:00 PM
1554 Views
No way, me too.
- 30/08/2009 11:15:01 PM
1573 Views
Well, I might as well say it
- 31/08/2009 12:20:58 AM
1612 Views
Maybe we should just lynch Isaac.
- 30/08/2009 07:32:50 PM
1702 Views
Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:29:01 PM
1610 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:57:17 PM
1541 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 09:01:20 PM
1571 Views
I'm going to facepalm
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1542 Views
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1542 Views
LOL, you miss the point
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1639 Views
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1639 Views
How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 09:30:14 PM
1576 Views
Re: How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 10:02:33 PM
1718 Views
Do you mean that since you can't lie, saying you're for the Tower proves your goodness?
- 31/08/2009 01:44:01 AM
1484 Views
BTW
- 30/08/2009 08:43:16 PM
1647 Views
I would suggest you do it anyway so they're at least saved on this site. *NM*
- 30/08/2009 10:07:26 PM
990 Views
I just sent myself the saved copy I had.
- 30/08/2009 10:17:46 PM
1620 Views
Howdy
- 31/08/2009 04:42:47 PM
1526 Views
I still can't see the fuss over Isaac's post
- 31/08/2009 05:25:14 PM
1615 Views
It was a misunderstanding, I think
- 31/08/2009 06:07:54 PM
1572 Views
^Read this^ Rather than the long discussion by Isaac and F-T
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
854 Views
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
854 Views
See, that looks pretty bad for you.
- 31/08/2009 07:37:28 PM
1551 Views
I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:49:45 PM
1529 Views
Re: I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:50:00 PM
1648 Views
? Never double-posted that way before *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:15:21 PM
909 Views
Congratulations of discovering new and exciting ways for us to embarrass ourselves
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
858 Views
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
858 Views
Well,
- 31/08/2009 09:00:47 PM
1488 Views
He said it was suspicious saying "For the Tower" as opposed to "For the Light".
- 31/08/2009 09:13:25 PM
1551 Views
It does look suspicous at this point....
- 31/08/2009 09:54:56 PM
1558 Views
I see what you mean but hardly agree with it
- 01/09/2009 02:05:07 AM
1559 Views
It's the best we've got right now.
- 01/09/2009 02:44:20 AM
1489 Views
I've done so much today. Hours of engineering and chem...again. *NM*
- 01/09/2009 02:57:08 AM
942 Views
I'm here
- 31/08/2009 06:16:40 PM
1477 Views
What's with everyone switching their usernames to their real names? lol *NM*
- 31/08/2009 08:51:23 PM
905 Views
Might as well move along
- 01/09/2009 12:36:28 AM
1584 Views
Okay.
- 01/09/2009 02:50:21 PM
1579 Views
Well, WF has had two days to reply, but hasn't even tried to defend himself.
- 01/09/2009 03:24:11 PM
1631 Views
I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 03:45:31 PM
1540 Views
Re: I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 07:23:00 PM
1488 Views
Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:26:29 PM
1553 Views
Re: Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:36:31 PM
1486 Views
I don't want a repeat of Game 2.
- 01/09/2009 07:50:57 PM
1574 Views
This is a good point.
- 01/09/2009 08:06:24 PM
1596 Views
As soon as he starts getting accused...
- 01/09/2009 09:49:14 PM
1503 Views
What you did was suspicious
- 01/09/2009 09:50:56 PM
1503 Views
I wish wotmania were still alive....
- 01/09/2009 10:06:03 PM
1536 Views
Yeah, and we cut you slack because you were a newbie.
- 01/09/2009 10:10:34 PM
1542 Views
Oh, well...
- 01/09/2009 10:53:57 PM
1477 Views
Well...it doesn't change what your doing
- 01/09/2009 11:02:48 PM
1500 Views
to avoid loads of editing
- 01/09/2009 09:22:36 PM
1632 Views
All right, I think we need to throw in the towel
- 01/09/2009 09:33:04 PM
1610 Views
nuts
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1574 Views
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1574 Views
Re: nuts
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1649 Views
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1649 Views
*sigh*
- 01/09/2009 10:27:57 PM
1535 Views
I still don't think we need to quit.
- 01/09/2009 10:31:30 PM
1592 Views
Guess I'll vote for White Flame as well.
- 01/09/2009 11:46:00 PM
1661 Views
Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 07:21:56 AM
1476 Views
Re: Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 06:58:22 PM
1574 Views
I think you should probably claim.
- 02/09/2009 08:24:02 PM
1463 Views
I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 09:42:48 PM
1464 Views
Re: I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 11:08:44 PM
1474 Views
Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 03:24:43 AM
1545 Views
Re: Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 03:59:05 AM
1593 Views
Re: Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 04:57:54 AM
1571 Views
Who are your warders?
- 02/09/2009 11:10:28 PM
1544 Views
My claim
- 03/09/2009 05:04:26 PM
1604 Views
Ok....
- 03/09/2009 05:08:25 PM
1421 Views
It doesn't sound that outlandish to me.
- 03/09/2009 07:11:06 PM
1490 Views
Nor I, but we now have some definite leads to work with
- 04/09/2009 05:13:18 AM
1540 Views
I'm not a warder
- 04/09/2009 01:01:27 PM
1481 Views
the situation so far
- 04/09/2009 06:02:36 PM
1498 Views
Can you keep some kind of constant form for the vote counts?
- 04/09/2009 06:11:53 PM
1504 Views

*NM*