Active Users:638 Time:14/10/2025 11:26:36 PM
The case that decided information can't be stolen dates from 1987. Tim Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 09:35:31 AM
Grant v Allan 1987 JC 71. In short, an employee was prosecuted for making copies of confidential information to sell to his employer's business rivals. He said "this isn't a crime", and the sheriff (first-instance judge) rejected his argument, but on appeal the High Court said he was right.

By the way, in Scots criminal law the prosecution doesn't have to name the crime it thinks you've committed. It just has to say what it claims you did, and if the charge discloses any crime, it will be relevant. In this case that is precisely how the prosecution went about it: they didn't mention the word "theft" at all. So what this case means is that copying confidential information isn't a crime at all, not just that it isn't theft.

However, it is totally uncontroversial that what he allegedly did constituted the delict of "breach of confidence".

(You'll note that I didn't say he actually did it. This is because he successfully defended himself by saying "what I'm accused of isn't a crime", so the prosecution never got a chance to prove he did it.)
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1614 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 1261 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 1174 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 1243 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1335 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 1209 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 1079 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 589 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 1166 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 1231 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 1085 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1608 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 1211 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1455 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 1155 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 1162 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 1031 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 1435 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 1202 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 1359 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 1121 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 1149 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 1132 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 1278 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 1301 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 1208 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 1083 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 1040 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 1072 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 656 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 1109 Views
The case that decided information can't be stolen dates from 1987. - 20/01/2011 09:35:31 AM 1897 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 1033 Views

Reply to Message