Active Users:390 Time:01/05/2025 12:39:18 AM
In some places it's exactly that Brian Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM
If a speed limit sign is obscured by a bush and I'm unable to see it that makes me ignorant of the law. You can't get a traffic ticket for that. I've seen it successfully fought.

I think a better example would be an obscure traffic law rather than the speed limit. For example if you turn over an "imaginary island" you can be ticketed. There's nothing to prevent you from driving over one, and many people wouldn't have the foggiest as to what an imaginary island is, but in spite of this you can be ticketed for driving over one.

I got a ticket for doing that once, and tried the I don't know what that is, so how could I be expected to follow a law whose existence I had absolutely no knowledge of? The judge gave the exact same response Stephen did: "Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense."


Is it one of those spots at an intersection outlined with thick white stripes and has white stripes pointed diagonally through it, that's what's coming to my mind.

In others it's simply a spot where the yellow lines separate and there is a section of road between them. Nothing painted through it or anything, and it can actually look a lot like a simple turn lane. The one you're describing seems like common sense that you couldn't drive on, the other sort.....maybe it is common knowledge, maybe not, I certainly didn't know you couldn't drive on them at the time.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1447 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 1108 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 1020 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 1097 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1184 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 1054 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 916 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 480 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 1006 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 1063 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 935 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1426 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 1052 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1288 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 988 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 1002 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 872 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 1138 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 1041 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 1073 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 951 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 993 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 983 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 1099 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 1136 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 1030 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 932 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 894 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 914 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 542 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 952 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 883 Views

Reply to Message