Active Users:223 Time:06/05/2024 04:53:30 PM
In some places it's exactly that Brian Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM
If a speed limit sign is obscured by a bush and I'm unable to see it that makes me ignorant of the law. You can't get a traffic ticket for that. I've seen it successfully fought.

I think a better example would be an obscure traffic law rather than the speed limit. For example if you turn over an "imaginary island" you can be ticketed. There's nothing to prevent you from driving over one, and many people wouldn't have the foggiest as to what an imaginary island is, but in spite of this you can be ticketed for driving over one.

I got a ticket for doing that once, and tried the I don't know what that is, so how could I be expected to follow a law whose existence I had absolutely no knowledge of? The judge gave the exact same response Stephen did: "Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense."


Is it one of those spots at an intersection outlined with thick white stripes and has white stripes pointed diagonally through it, that's what's coming to my mind.

In others it's simply a spot where the yellow lines separate and there is a section of road between them. Nothing painted through it or anything, and it can actually look a lot like a simple turn lane. The one you're describing seems like common sense that you couldn't drive on, the other sort.....maybe it is common knowledge, maybe not, I certainly didn't know you couldn't drive on them at the time.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1277 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 914 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 836 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 916 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1023 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 868 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 750 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 402 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 837 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 885 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 752 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1259 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 882 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1114 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 806 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 820 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 720 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 936 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 883 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 894 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 774 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 863 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 825 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 939 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 948 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 837 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 743 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 719 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 751 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 466 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 772 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 719 Views

Reply to Message