Active Users:320 Time:28/04/2024 11:00:35 AM
I prefer WASPy casts. badassashaman Send a noteboard - 26/09/2011 03:28:06 PM
First, let me get a political rant out of the way: "Gee, yet another show with a WASPy main cast. Thanks, Hollywood." Rant over.

Now to the real reasons. To begin with, 85 million years ago is a !!!Stupid!!! choice for humans fleeing a dying 22nd century Earth. If the settlers haven't managed to bring along a few cows, horses, pigs, etc., just how do they plan domesticating herbivores that (a) can stand 20 feet at the shoulder and reach 100 feet in length; or (b) are heavily armored all over and Only half the size of a city bus. Meanwhile, of course, they'll be trying to avoid T.Rex, various raptors, etc.

Hopefully, the settlers will have brought a few seed packets of modern grains, etc. along. Otherwise, what are they going to do for food and clothing?

And there's the problem of natural resources and a future industrial base (unless they decide to become cave men). 85 million years ago, there'll be a definite lower available amount of petroleum, natural gas, etc. With major continental shift to come before Earth reaches its present arrangement of land and sea, how will the settlers know where to even look for these resources?

A far better time for the basic show concept would be 40-50,000 years ago, toward the end of the last Ice Age. The continents are mostly where they are now, so you'll know where to find resources when you need them. If you can only bring a few domestic animals and will be heaving depending on frozen embryos, it should be fairly easy to use aurochs, for example, as host mothers to speed up production of dairy cows. Secondly, you'd have not just genetically modern humans around (Cro-Magnon) but another intelligent species still here (Neandertal). Incidentally, if you think the two species never interbred, take a good look at a picture of an elderly Charles Darwin.


Since, you know, I am one.

And I agree that going back to dinosaur time is a dumb idea. They hopefully have some kind of *really good* explanation as to why they picked this timeline, but they'll probably just say it seemed like a good idea and pretend to have an unlimited supply of bullets, explosives, electricity, and medical supplies.

That being said, I will still give the pilot a shot.
Reply to message
Why I'm Not Going To Watch "Terra Nova" - 26/09/2011 03:15:51 PM 710 Views
I prefer WASPy casts. - 26/09/2011 03:28:06 PM 514 Views
I don't know anything about the show, but ... - 26/09/2011 03:44:06 PM 442 Views
That's true - 26/09/2011 03:52:59 PM 378 Views
Re: That's true - 26/09/2011 07:57:19 PM 450 Views
Me too. - 27/09/2011 01:08:57 PM 523 Views
My ideas on time travel. [Theoretically, obviously] - 26/09/2011 07:15:39 PM 404 Views
Re: My ideas on time travel. [Theoretically, obviously] - 26/09/2011 07:34:23 PM 462 Views
My ideas are slightly different. - 26/09/2011 07:36:16 PM 427 Views
Re: My ideas are slightly different. - 26/09/2011 09:01:17 PM 429 Views
Re: My ideas are slightly different. - 26/09/2011 10:22:48 PM 472 Views
A very lacy wheel of time perhaps? - 26/09/2011 11:13:34 PM 371 Views
Sure sounds loopy - 27/09/2011 05:14:36 PM 450 Views
maybe they figured that the asteroid would remove their effect? *NM* - 27/09/2011 01:02:39 AM 209 Views
I just find the whole premise odd. It can't end well. - 26/09/2011 03:50:49 PM 404 Views
I don't think I'm gonna watch Juravitar Park. *NM* - 26/09/2011 11:56:27 PM 198 Views
Nathaniel Quaritch says, "Nothing's over while I'm breathing!" - 27/09/2011 12:55:25 AM 436 Views
- 28/09/2011 04:04:38 PM 472 Views

Reply to Message