Active Users:204 Time:18/05/2024 10:11:59 AM
Huh...what a strange reaction. Kotagg Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 06:20:17 PM
The Avengers were formed as part of a government organization to create a team of superheroes that would work LOOSELY together to protect the United States and the world from any threat too large to be handled by one superhero alone. For the most part these heroes continue to work on their own, but band together when needed. I'm not sure how that sounds silly.

For this movie, Loki has otherworldly allies and as such is too much for Thor to handle by himself - or anyone else for that matter, so this is why they band together. Also note that this isn't by happenstance or sudden at all: if you've watched the movies of each individual hero and waited until after the credits, each one has Nick Fury (Sam Jackson) appearing to talk to the heroes about the "Avenger initiative." This team has been in planning for over four years in Marvel-time, for the reasons listed in my first paragraph.

Now. If you do not like the idea of people who would otherwise not work together having difficulty working together, and becoming a team with a somewhat happy ending...I don't know what to tell you. Should they work together instantly, these near-deific beings that aren't used to being challenged in any meaningful way?
Reply to message
New Avengers trailer. - 01/03/2012 12:09:17 AM 858 Views
I don't usually use the dislike button on youtube... - 01/03/2012 12:58:07 AM 671 Views
It's not as if this movie franchise came up with the idea of teaming them up - 01/03/2012 08:06:36 AM 471 Views
Like I said, I never read the comics. But I'm totally fine with blaming them for the crossover - 01/03/2012 05:30:16 PM 439 Views
Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 06:20:10 PM 439 Views
Re: Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 07:05:00 PM 491 Views
Great point! - 01/03/2012 08:19:15 PM 629 Views
Pff. - 01/03/2012 09:27:14 PM 514 Views
I would think you & your kind would be least excited. - 02/03/2012 07:14:36 PM 416 Views
I am no purist by any means - 02/03/2012 09:30:41 PM 485 Views
Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 01/03/2012 05:16:16 PM 375 Views
Re: Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 02/03/2012 01:48:59 AM 450 Views
I'm just saying, what are they "Avenging?" - 02/03/2012 05:59:57 PM 449 Views
IT. SOUNDS. COOL. Stop asking questions. They HATE it when you ask questions about this stuff *NM* - 02/03/2012 07:06:38 PM 201 Views
WHO MAKES ALL THEIR COSTUMES *NM* - 04/03/2012 01:44:45 AM 194 Views
Reed Richards conceived of the unstable molecules fabric. - 06/03/2012 06:47:18 PM 472 Views
Edna Mole *NM* - 06/03/2012 09:56:34 PM 330 Views
Mode. Edna Mode. *NM* - 06/03/2012 11:57:59 PM 213 Views
Avenging the deaths of all those innocents incinerated by ray guns? *NM* - 03/03/2012 01:59:14 AM 227 Views
Huh...what a strange reaction. - 01/03/2012 06:20:17 PM 452 Views
The only thing you said that matters: - 03/03/2012 06:55:20 PM 457 Views
SCHWING! *NM* - 01/03/2012 03:24:58 AM 218 Views
YES! *NM* - 01/03/2012 08:46:05 AM 241 Views

Reply to Message