Active Users:394 Time:01/05/2025 06:19:00 PM
Huh...what a strange reaction. Kotagg Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 06:20:17 PM
The Avengers were formed as part of a government organization to create a team of superheroes that would work LOOSELY together to protect the United States and the world from any threat too large to be handled by one superhero alone. For the most part these heroes continue to work on their own, but band together when needed. I'm not sure how that sounds silly.

For this movie, Loki has otherworldly allies and as such is too much for Thor to handle by himself - or anyone else for that matter, so this is why they band together. Also note that this isn't by happenstance or sudden at all: if you've watched the movies of each individual hero and waited until after the credits, each one has Nick Fury (Sam Jackson) appearing to talk to the heroes about the "Avenger initiative." This team has been in planning for over four years in Marvel-time, for the reasons listed in my first paragraph.

Now. If you do not like the idea of people who would otherwise not work together having difficulty working together, and becoming a team with a somewhat happy ending...I don't know what to tell you. Should they work together instantly, these near-deific beings that aren't used to being challenged in any meaningful way?
Reply to message
New Avengers trailer. - 01/03/2012 12:09:17 AM 1015 Views
I don't usually use the dislike button on youtube... - 01/03/2012 12:58:07 AM 829 Views
It's not as if this movie franchise came up with the idea of teaming them up - 01/03/2012 08:06:36 AM 606 Views
Like I said, I never read the comics. But I'm totally fine with blaming them for the crossover - 01/03/2012 05:30:16 PM 582 Views
Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 06:20:10 PM 543 Views
Re: Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 07:05:00 PM 636 Views
Great point! - 01/03/2012 08:19:15 PM 772 Views
Pff. - 01/03/2012 09:27:14 PM 663 Views
I would think you & your kind would be least excited. - 02/03/2012 07:14:36 PM 554 Views
I am no purist by any means - 02/03/2012 09:30:41 PM 627 Views
Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 01/03/2012 05:16:16 PM 522 Views
Re: Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 02/03/2012 01:48:59 AM 595 Views
I'm just saying, what are they "Avenging?" - 02/03/2012 05:59:57 PM 593 Views
IT. SOUNDS. COOL. Stop asking questions. They HATE it when you ask questions about this stuff *NM* - 02/03/2012 07:06:38 PM 263 Views
WHO MAKES ALL THEIR COSTUMES *NM* - 04/03/2012 01:44:45 AM 253 Views
Reed Richards conceived of the unstable molecules fabric. - 06/03/2012 06:47:18 PM 608 Views
Edna Mole *NM* - 06/03/2012 09:56:34 PM 406 Views
Mode. Edna Mode. *NM* - 06/03/2012 11:57:59 PM 290 Views
Avenging the deaths of all those innocents incinerated by ray guns? *NM* - 03/03/2012 01:59:14 AM 280 Views
Huh...what a strange reaction. - 01/03/2012 06:20:17 PM 602 Views
The only thing you said that matters: - 03/03/2012 06:55:20 PM 587 Views
SCHWING! *NM* - 01/03/2012 03:24:58 AM 273 Views
YES! *NM* - 01/03/2012 08:46:05 AM 299 Views

Reply to Message