Active Users:419 Time:18/06/2025 10:56:41 AM
Re: Nice theory with number 2 dacole Send a noteboard - 24/04/2012 05:16:49 AM

2) The girl actually is Jeyne Westerling. in the books, Jeyne's mother is from the Free Cities (not Volantis that I remember though) and she could well have a different appearance because of that. She's joined the Lannister war effort as a healer/battlefield nurse as a volunteer (which may actually be something that's normal in Westeros, or it may be down to her wilfulness; she may even have sneaked off under an alias).

A more Machivellian possibility is that she's deliberately been planted to catch Robb's eye, but that seems highly implausible, given the Starks staged a surprise attack and secured a totally unpredictable victory that could not have been foreseen.


The unforeseeable circumstances of her being there for Robb are not so much, if a bit advanced. Stafford's host was raised in light of Robb holding Riverrun, athwart the Lannisters' lines of communication with their own lands, so their goal was to move east and threaten or attack Robb at some point. Since Tywin would prefer to converge on the Starks with his own force and the new one, an encounter between Robb & Stafford's forces would almost certainly be to the Lannisters' disadvantage, with Jeyne being a good fallback if Robb was getting too powerful.

The only problem with this scenario is it requires a lot more cooperation on her part than seems to have existed in Sybelle Westerling's plot in the books, and is a bit of a risky gamble to ensnare a would-be king, with much greater risks to Jeyne's virtue and whatnot. If she does turn out to be Jeyne, it would be entirely in keeping with the PC tropes I disparaged above for her to have run away to join the army as a medic and "do some good." I confess I had forgotten the specifics of her maternal ancestry which might support her having medical knowledge, as the books made no suggestion Sybelle had passed on her pharmacological expertise (tricking Jeyne into taking contraceptives would be a lot harder, for one thing). Though Jeyne was mentioned tending to the wound Robb took in the attack on the castle, I kind of glossed over that part, assuming it was teenage hormones exaggerating what was nothing more than sitting by his side and holding a cup for him to drink or putting cloths on his forehead and the other stuff people do to pretend they are helping an invalid. In hindsight, she very probably could have had the knowledge and whatnot to provide real treatment.


agreed that it would make it hard to believe the way we are told the plot actually played out later. I was wondering if people were forgetting that she actually WAS used to catch Robb's eye in the books...
Reply to message
Game of Thrones 2.04 Garden of Bones: OF COURSE SHE HAS TO HAVE A JOB! - 23/04/2012 04:14:01 PM 1147 Views
Yeah, don't know where they're going with the Robb Stark love interest - 23/04/2012 06:14:16 PM 872 Views
Fairly sure they cast Oona Chaplin as Jeyne EDIT - 23/04/2012 07:17:18 PM 706 Views
Or they dropped the character all together, as they seem wont to do *NM* - 23/04/2012 09:21:08 PM 295 Views
There's some confusion here. - 23/04/2012 10:37:56 PM 770 Views
Nice theory with number 2 - 24/04/2012 12:02:17 AM 817 Views
Re: Nice theory with number 2 - 24/04/2012 05:16:49 AM 643 Views
I didn't remember much about the specifics... - 24/04/2012 07:43:19 PM 679 Views
I've actually got a better thought now. - 24/04/2012 11:30:45 PM 805 Views
I'm guessing no. - 23/04/2012 07:50:57 PM 734 Views
Very astute. I concur with everything you said *NM* - 23/04/2012 09:19:53 PM 324 Views
Re: Game of Thrones 2.04 Garden of Bones: OF COURSE SHE HAS TO HAVE A JOB! - 24/04/2012 05:13:02 AM 734 Views
Arya - 24/04/2012 08:58:30 AM 773 Views
Re: Game of Thrones 2.04 Garden of Bones: OF COURSE SHE HAS TO HAVE A JOB! - 24/04/2012 01:19:40 PM 870 Views
+1 - 29/04/2012 07:52:24 PM 612 Views
Re: Game of Thrones 2.04 Garden of Bones: OF COURSE SHE HAS TO HAVE A JOB! - 01/05/2012 01:25:44 AM 609 Views
We've covered this to death on Westeros - 01/05/2012 02:00:49 PM 658 Views
Re: We've covered this to death on Westeros - 09/05/2012 11:40:03 AM 679 Views
Yeah I dunno what to make of that either - 24/04/2012 09:28:48 AM 744 Views
To be fair, non-readers come away with a different experience. - 24/04/2012 02:19:01 PM 701 Views
Re: To be fair, non-readers come away with a different experience. - 01/05/2012 01:27:09 AM 573 Views
Sorry, I thought I had posted a link here last week... - 08/05/2012 07:28:57 AM 773 Views
Re: Sorry, I thought I had posted a link here last week... - 18/05/2012 06:10:02 AM 765 Views

Reply to Message