Active Users:897 Time:16/09/2026 12:51:37 AM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1708 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 1200 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1354 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 1015 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 952 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 919 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 995 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 931 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 975 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 989 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 959 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 877 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 966 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 996 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 1004 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 946 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 1024 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 1064 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 966 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 910 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 920 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 951 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 916 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 524 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 436 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 922 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 1140 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 945 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 890 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 1020 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 959 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 1055 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 1120 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 923 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 887 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 943 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 1062 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 993 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 466 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 979 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 915 Views

Reply to Message