Active Users:1216 Time:01/08/2026 10:30:53 PM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1677 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 1177 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1337 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 994 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 926 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 891 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 974 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 912 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 952 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 967 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 939 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 853 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 945 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 973 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 990 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 926 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 1000 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 1039 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 944 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 888 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 899 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 929 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 899 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 514 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 428 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 900 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 1121 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 919 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 862 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 997 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 939 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 1033 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 1101 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 902 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 868 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 920 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 1041 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 975 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 458 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 956 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 892 Views

Reply to Message