Active Users:446 Time:04/05/2025 01:31:22 AM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1454 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 907 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1001 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 760 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 691 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 663 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 698 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 677 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 711 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 722 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 708 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 619 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 705 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 730 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 744 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 706 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 770 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 767 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 720 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 657 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 665 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 672 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 653 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 397 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 311 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 687 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 883 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 676 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 617 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 740 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 722 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 780 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 874 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 679 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 642 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 689 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 783 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 730 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 338 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 689 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 667 Views

Reply to Message