Active Users:902 Time:16/09/2026 12:51:13 AM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1707 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 1200 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1353 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 1014 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 951 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 918 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 994 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 930 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 974 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 988 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 958 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 876 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 965 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 995 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 1003 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 945 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 1023 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 1063 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 965 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 909 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 919 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 950 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 915 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 524 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 436 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 921 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 1139 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 945 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 889 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 1019 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 958 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 1054 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 1119 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 922 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 886 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 942 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 1061 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 993 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 466 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 979 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 914 Views

Reply to Message