Active Users:264 Time:08/05/2024 08:59:52 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad Send a noteboard - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM
Just saying most influential film maker (which I take to include producers, EPs, cinematographers, editors as well as the directors).

Of course, I might be reading his post wrong.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? Dannymac - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 973 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* MightyYT - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 308 Views
Absolutely, right. ironclad - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 678 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* beetnemesis - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 309 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* DomA - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 275 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs Roland00 - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 596 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 530 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola Cannoli - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 722 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked. Dannymac - 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM 581 Views
Hell has frozen over imlad - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 602 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. Cannoli - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 643 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me imlad - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 623 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 780 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title DomA - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 566 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM 601 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* Dannymac - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 304 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 271 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 584 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but imlad - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 610 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* ironclad - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 271 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 278 Views
Short answer, no. HyogaRott - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 663 Views
So who beats him out? Dannymac - 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM 550 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things. HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM 721 Views
You have a strange definition of influence. Nate - 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM 604 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM 640 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM* HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM 307 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM 559 Views
Well, as a director he doesn't usually even warrant mention Tom - 18/10/2012 10:27:24 PM 770 Views
Absolutely not. Tom - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 724 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes