Active Users:622 Time:20/03/2026 12:15:59 PM
Re: A rebuttal! For the points I disagree with, anyway. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/12/2009 08:48:55 PM

First, the "bomb from orbit." Why in the world would a transport ship have weapons capabilities? Our space shuttles certainly don't. Maybe this would have been feasible and maybe not, but I don't think it requires much suspension of disbelief to assume "not." And furthermore, it was stated that "a select few humans were allowed to stay." Maybe this means only good guys. Or maybe it includes ten or twenty hostages. Bomb us (just for money, mind you, you're in no danger up there) and you kill your commanders.


Bombing from orbit doesn't require that much in the way of weaponry. Recall the movies "Deep Impact" and "Armageddon" and their "chunk of rock from space being exponentially worse than nukes" scenarios. That is the principle behind kinetic energy weapons. You just toss a piece of sufficiently massive matter out the door and if you aim right, you get the same effect as a nuclear weapon. This is not something I made up - it is a common idea in science fiction, called "kinetic energy weapons." And hostages? Really? You think the big profit-hungry corporation is going to let THAT stop them? A KEW strike wouldn't leave enough bits for forensics to contest their assertion that the natives whacked the hostages anyway. And anyway, I am pretty sure it means good guys. The camera showed the fat black guy and the scrawny nerd when it said that, and it showed the corporate boss guy being led off in the line of those being kicked out. So, not hostages.

One few final notes
- The "ridiculously exposed rotors" are less exposed than helicopter rotors which have been used in combat against foes far more technically advanced than the Pandorans for over fifty years.

- Your counter-argument against humans being the underdogs seems to be that humans are just so badass that severe numerical, environmental and physiological handicaps are insufficient to overcome their awesome toughness!

- Your arguments about the capabilities of the corporation to come back again are a little strange. You talk about the prohibitive expense of sending the expedition as if it could be reasonably expected to bankrupt the company, but at the same time seem to think that space travel is so common as to enable companies to blithely send out mining expeditions on other planets without government approval and open assistance! Any company with the wealth to invest in interplanetary mining ventures, genetically engineer avatars & patronize useless scientists on the off-chance they might come up with something interesting, is going to have significant investments in government. If they really are operating on a shoestring, with all of these prohinitively expensive investments being underfinanced gambles hoping for a big return to pay for them, then there must be other, more wealthy and powerful companies capable of learning from the mistakes and going in full bore. If the company is the most wealthy and dominant company in the world, this loss could not have undone them - they have the ability to make so much more money from the technology they demonstrate that this one expedition cannot possibly be their sole or primary hope of income.
- If they can engineer Pandoran life-forms so as to create avatars capable of interacting biologically with the natural ones, how long do you think it would take them to whip up so bioweapons capable of taking care of all those naked savages without risking a single infantryman?
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
"Avatar" discussion thread - 17/12/2009 08:10:04 AM 2520 Views
Innovative world-building sci-fi, dull cliched story - 17/12/2009 01:13:47 PM 1227 Views
Agreed for the most part... - 17/12/2009 11:05:27 PM 1203 Views
Doesn't that last paragraph describe Star Wars? *NM* - 18/12/2009 03:33:58 AM 612 Views
*snorts* *NM* - 18/12/2009 09:03:05 AM 494 Views
Re: Doesn't that last paragraph describe Star Wars? - 18/12/2009 09:49:23 AM 1110 Views
Star Wars had many things. Good characters was not one of them. *NM* - 18/12/2009 09:06:18 PM 520 Views
Re: Star Wars had many things. Good characters was not one of them. - 19/12/2009 02:57:43 AM 1078 Views
Avatar is basically Return of the Jedi, at least the part on Endor. But less militarily plausible - 19/12/2009 02:22:35 AM 1315 Views
Watch the movie again. - 19/12/2009 03:08:05 AM 1329 Views
It's a watered-down Dune. *NM* - 21/12/2009 08:41:39 AM 722 Views
What struck me the most about this movie... - 22/12/2009 01:25:00 AM 1131 Views
Predictable with a tired & preachy plot. (spoilers) Also, the ending was completely ludicrous. - 19/12/2009 03:02:21 AM 1594 Views
You need help *NM* - 19/12/2009 07:33:52 AM 757 Views
A rebuttal! For the points I disagree with, anyway. - 20/12/2009 05:07:59 AM 1163 Views
Re: A rebuttal! For the points I disagree with, anyway. - 21/12/2009 08:48:55 PM 1232 Views
It would help if you'd leave my quotes by the arguments, but whatever. - 22/12/2009 10:36:42 AM 1135 Views
Heh... - 29/12/2009 11:01:41 PM 1075 Views
wow, you really do need help - 21/12/2009 07:23:12 AM 1358 Views
If the bad guy has all the stones and still loses, how heroic were the heroes? - 21/12/2009 08:53:00 PM 1171 Views
Wow...you're serious? Really?? - 22/12/2009 04:56:20 PM 1095 Views
lol - 22/12/2009 04:59:47 PM 1034 Views
That's uncalled for IMO - 25/12/2009 09:04:01 PM 1251 Views
I am pretty sure she refered to the fact that he sheered for the bad guys and wished the Na'vi ill. - 25/12/2009 09:19:32 PM 1115 Views
He didn't cheer for them - 26/12/2009 01:05:40 AM 1088 Views
...an attitude I always found a bit worrisome, too *NM* - 26/12/2009 11:48:40 AM 628 Views
I tend to agree - 21/12/2009 03:23:54 PM 1052 Views
I thought the same things, but... - 25/12/2009 08:29:09 PM 1091 Views
A fun time. Predictable, but not in a bad way. Minor Spoilers. - 19/12/2009 03:05:19 AM 1073 Views
you said Fern Gully ^_^ - 19/12/2009 09:01:58 PM 1106 Views
Spectacular - 19/12/2009 02:54:53 PM 1146 Views
A wonder of a movie experience *minor spoilers* - 19/12/2009 08:47:06 PM 1211 Views
Very good and fun, but not world-shattering. - 19/12/2009 11:19:26 PM 1374 Views
Has anyone seen this in 3D and not enjoyed it?? - 20/12/2009 06:11:52 PM 1209 Views
Cannoli, presumably. *NM* - 20/12/2009 10:41:48 PM 709 Views
Sure make fun of the visually impaired, asshole. - 21/12/2009 08:57:33 PM 1169 Views
Yeah, that's totally what I was doing. - 21/12/2009 11:59:26 PM 1226 Views
Do you buy them from antique shops? *NM* - 22/12/2009 01:10:12 AM 700 Views
Does this include the new 3D? - 22/12/2009 01:17:07 AM 1279 Views
same here - 22/12/2009 02:59:32 PM 990 Views
I'm tempted to make a joke about the depth of your posts. *NM* - 22/12/2009 04:31:04 AM 519 Views
is that what we are calling tunnel vision these days? *NM* - 24/12/2009 07:04:08 PM 626 Views
Dammit! So much better than mine. *NM* - 26/12/2009 05:19:19 AM 581 Views
Saw it with my family. - 20/12/2009 09:10:56 PM 1028 Views
Sci-fi Pocahontas - 21/12/2009 01:12:02 AM 1194 Views
My friend and I spent the whole movie - 07/01/2010 12:50:56 AM 1023 Views
Oh so you're the kind of movie-goer in the seat behind me... - 07/01/2010 11:20:56 AM 1005 Views
No way! - 07/01/2010 03:48:48 PM 909 Views
that you mock at all is incredibly disrespectful - 07/01/2010 05:31:55 PM 1095 Views
You're overreacting. - 07/01/2010 06:20:06 PM 1055 Views
You said you do it quietly - 07/01/2010 08:18:07 PM 1069 Views
Fair enough, fair enough. *NM* - 07/01/2010 08:57:23 PM 638 Views
Except maybe the purist who really needs to be kept in a total sensory deprivation chamber. *NM* - 08/01/2010 10:51:58 PM 541 Views
Nothing's more satisfying that seeing and hearing the crowd around you react like you do - 09/01/2010 01:36:36 PM 976 Views
*NM* - 09/01/2010 03:59:28 PM 594 Views
You should never watch a movie with me. - 10/01/2010 01:23:30 AM 1068 Views
There's a gentlebot to see you, says his name is Tom Servo. - 08/01/2010 03:59:34 AM 1070 Views
3D IMAX is worth the extra money... - 21/12/2009 08:40:57 AM 1121 Views
The only thing I am upset about - 21/12/2009 09:38:17 AM 1342 Views
Oh yeah, that puppy's been selling out like crazy. - 22/12/2009 12:01:18 AM 971 Views
Visually stunning. - 24/12/2009 02:12:42 PM 991 Views
As usual, Hollywood shoves an ideology down peoples' throats. *NM* - 26/12/2009 04:30:20 AM 484 Views
Once they've paid their ten bucks to get in. *NM* - 27/12/2009 04:31:59 AM 584 Views
A good ideology assault doesn't come cheap! *NM* - 28/12/2009 10:03:08 AM 611 Views
$14 evening show with 3D glasses. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:15:03 AM 695 Views
one point i haven't seen discussed yet.... - 26/12/2009 05:43:05 AM 1270 Views
It stinks!! *NM* - 26/12/2009 05:51:30 AM 719 Views
So, a silly thing I found distracting... - 29/12/2009 07:26:02 AM 1140 Views
that caught my eye too - 29/12/2009 07:36:46 AM 1031 Views
A silly thing I found distracting was that the aliens were humanoid. *NM* - 29/12/2009 09:48:46 AM 657 Views
Umm you would rather watch non-humanoid aliens? Yeah thats fun *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:29:26 PM 554 Views
*sigh* - 30/12/2009 11:09:16 AM 998 Views
Yes. Yes. - 01/01/2010 08:19:58 AM 1058 Views
I have missed you so much on this site. *NM* - 02/01/2010 04:13:56 AM 525 Views
well. it's not necessarily erroneous either. - 30/12/2009 06:28:57 AM 1026 Views
See my response to Dark Knight above. *NM* - 30/12/2009 11:11:27 AM 572 Views
ah okay. carry on then *NM* - 30/12/2009 04:44:12 PM 643 Views
Yes. - 03/01/2010 05:08:17 PM 1111 Views
I believe she was speaking about their tails. - 07/01/2010 07:37:46 AM 973 Views
If I remember it was the "USB Plug" in their hair. *NM* - 08/01/2010 08:29:38 AM 679 Views
Yep - 08/01/2010 09:33:08 AM 1070 Views
*facepalm* yah, that's what i was talking about - 08/01/2010 05:31:33 PM 1035 Views
I figured - 08/01/2010 05:50:22 PM 1069 Views
Yes, the plot is simple, predictable and ideological - 29/12/2009 07:41:36 AM 1020 Views
It was the best movie I've seen in ages. I'm seriously thinking of going to see it again. *NM* - 29/12/2009 12:20:11 PM 723 Views
We definitely will. - 29/12/2009 03:30:07 PM 1050 Views
Going again tomorrow. *NM* - 02/01/2010 05:14:53 PM 724 Views
Project 880: The Avatar that might have been - 31/12/2009 10:30:21 AM 1329 Views
That is very interesting. - 31/12/2009 01:25:19 PM 1011 Views
yeah - 02/01/2010 01:56:15 PM 1120 Views
i think that would be interesting to see - 31/12/2009 04:29:19 PM 1151 Views
Avatar is/was gonna make a pile of money anyways. - 31/12/2009 08:30:34 PM 1295 Views
Re: I hated the 3-D effect. It was horrible. - 10/01/2010 09:39:25 AM 1055 Views
Stephen Colbert on Avatar - 15/01/2010 03:18:29 AM 885 Views
I liked it even better the 2nd time. *Spoilers* - 16/01/2010 12:23:50 AM 1011 Views
Yeah, I really liked the music. *NM* - 16/01/2010 06:04:55 AM 683 Views
It just took the double at the Golden Globes. - 18/01/2010 04:04:08 AM 1120 Views
Ok, wow, I didn't expect that to happen. *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:59:51 AM 504 Views
I can't say I'm surprised it did. Not that I agree with it. *NM* - 18/01/2010 07:37:08 PM 460 Views
Okay I bit the bullet and went to see it - 18/01/2010 11:56:28 PM 1042 Views
I always forget that I saw movies in 3D. - 19/01/2010 01:11:05 AM 1093 Views

Reply to Message