Active Users:1399 Time:17/12/2025 09:19:48 AM
Timelords are also humanoid Camilla Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM
but not human.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 530 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 561 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 487 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 410 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 383 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 510 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 382 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 506 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 376 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 393 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 405 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 485 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 352 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 196 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 404 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 409 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 396 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 386 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 398 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 378 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 457 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 382 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 445 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 477 Views

Reply to Message