Active Users:175 Time:17/05/2024 11:49:37 AM
Ok inside the dome. Michael Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM
Davros wasn't a human. He was a Kaled, the human-like species that the Daleks evolved into. We see the Kaleds running around like ordinary people in Genesis of the Daleks, a series with the Fourth Doctor, the wikipedia entry of which I have conveniently linked below.


The Daleks were what happened to the Kaleds who got stuck outside the dome and irradiated, evolved to their endpoint by Davros' experiments, I think. Ref, also Genesis of the Daleks. /geek


Nonono. Daleks were created by Davros within the dome.


They were irradiated mutations of the original Kaleds though, hence why he named them with an anagram...
The Monday Cafe - open when I damn well feel like it

I blame Alric
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 418 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 429 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 352 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 296 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 270 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 380 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 261 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 391 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 269 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 282 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 296 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 358 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 243 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 146 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 299 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 288 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 273 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 274 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 288 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 269 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 355 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 260 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 327 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 364 Views

Reply to Message