Active Users:341 Time:03/07/2025 06:38:34 PM
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM
Otherwise we find ourselves in the situation of asking why monsters around the world (usually without feet) are sometimes seen wearing shoes made in the 1960s and 1970s on Earth.

Having other races look exactly like people saved on a makeup budget.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 491 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 516 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 426 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 368 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 344 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 467 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 342 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 466 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 340 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 352 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 367 Views
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM 382 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 440 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 312 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 180 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 366 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 365 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 352 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 349 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 360 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 342 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 423 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 338 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 407 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 440 Views

Reply to Message