Active Users:595 Time:18/03/2026 09:53:46 PM
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM
More to the matter, Davros had said that the Dalek form was the "final result of continued Kaled evolution" and he "hurried" that evolution. How any evolutionary result could be "final" is scientifically suspect, but the statement stands.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 557 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 590 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 512 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 439 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 413 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 540 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 408 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 536 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 403 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 419 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 432 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 517 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 375 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 208 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 430 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 434 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 424 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 411 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 426 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 402 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 487 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 406 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 468 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 505 Views

Reply to Message