Active Users:416 Time:17/09/2025 08:09:14 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Interesting idea Mark Send a noteboard - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM
It sounds to me from the tone of the narration and the reaction from Timothy Dalton that the Time Lords' resurrection was a direct result of the end of time, presumably allowing them to escape whatever happened in the Time War.

I don't buy Wilf being a Time Lord, but wouldn't be surprised if he ends up dying to protect the Doctor.


I reckon he is but we will soon find out one way or the other.

And my "off the wall, don't really believe it, but it would not surprise me if RTD went there" solution to the Doctor's prophecy and Donna's soon to be melting brain is - ten will die in a blaze of glory (wouldn't really surprise me if he does it saving the Master) and the time lord part of Donna's being is what regenerates into doctor eleven, thus cleansing Donna of her Time Lord issues.


I hadn't thought of that before, such a move if it happened could also deal with the regeneration issue in that it would set the clock back to one
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? jh - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 508 Views
I'm glad we got so much of The Master - John Sim is a pretty wonderful actor. (some slight spoilers) snoopcester - 27/12/2009 03:11:27 PM 402 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* Camilla - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 535 Views
A good first part *spoilers* Mark - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 442 Views
Ooooh. Camilla - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 389 Views
I liked it. The Shrike - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 362 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. Tom - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 486 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. Camilla - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 358 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean The Shrike - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 484 Views
Timelords are also humanoid Camilla - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 356 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. The Shrike - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 373 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. Camilla - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 383 Views
Unless explicitly stated, we assume the simplest explanation - one heart. And human(oid). The Shrike - 29/12/2009 08:11:06 PM 344 Views
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. Tom - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM 399 Views
No, that was Leela. Tom - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 461 Views
I knew it was one of them Camilla - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 332 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* Tom - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 188 Views
This is true Camilla - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 382 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. Michael - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 384 Views
Mnonono Camilla - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 372 Views
Ok inside the dome. Michael - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 365 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. Camilla - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 377 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. Tom - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 358 Views
No, I'm not. Tom - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 440 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. Michael - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 357 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. Michael - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 424 Views
Interesting idea Mark - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 457 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes