Active Users:413 Time:17/06/2025 05:31:47 AM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1005 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 555 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 267 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 540 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 618 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 710 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 537 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 607 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 597 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 505 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 564 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 615 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 552 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 577 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 869 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 751 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 505 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 533 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 747 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 560 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 261 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 495 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 508 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 488 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 540 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 669 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 545 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 540 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 550 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 501 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 613 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 689 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 479 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 519 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 487 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 501 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 546 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 491 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 468 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 288 Views

Reply to Message