Active Users:451 Time:07/04/2026 06:20:18 PM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1127 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 657 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 311 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 657 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 745 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 837 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 648 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 708 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 694 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 620 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 700 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 722 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 693 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 686 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1007 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 848 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 631 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 640 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 873 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 660 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 310 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 605 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 621 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 596 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 665 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 803 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 661 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 664 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 662 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 614 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 749 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 808 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 593 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 637 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 585 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 601 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 650 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 591 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 576 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 352 Views

Reply to Message