Active Users:944 Time:03/08/2025 05:51:15 PM
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM
I always thought at the end, it would click over to another age, and age without the knowledge of the One Power.


perhaps, the funeral bier indicates an Arthurian type ending. magic will retreat to the isle of Avalon, err Tar'Valon. where a 1/2 dead king will sleep until needed again. :p

on the other hand. i think that is basically the end of the first age. The end of the second age would be in our near future or Armageddon. By this thinking I doubt that it would happen the same. I think this age will end in an advancement in tech and the power, the reverse of the breaking where tech and the power were lost. The AoL was full of pride and arrogance, it could be seen that the DO was the manifestation of peoples festering "sin". whereas this age seems to be gearing toward fixing those failings. men and women working together and the DR breaking all people of their pride and bringing them into submission to the greater good. It seems more like the series is heading toward a massive revolutionary type climax.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1404 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1006 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 773 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 886 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 847 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 813 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 745 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 358 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 719 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 771 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 799 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 729 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 895 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 780 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 718 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 757 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 750 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 741 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 813 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 749 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 762 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 386 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 722 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 364 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 412 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 795 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 704 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 736 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1049 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 747 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 851 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1192 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 773 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 764 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 811 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 886 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 846 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 768 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 716 Views

Reply to Message