Active Users:843 Time:01/02/2026 10:38:29 PM
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM
I think that with the nature of time being cyclical, the use of the terms 1st, 2nd or some other number in a sequential order largely becomes redundant and meaningless. For example, if you lived in the Third Age, the age coming before your ancestral memory before the First Age is forgotten, so that putting them in order is largely dependent on where you exist in relation to prior ages.

I think the world will be pretty well set up at the end of TG. I think the evil of Shayol Ghul will either become the next ultimate evil or be instrumental in destroying absolute evil, leaving the world in the hands of the petty disagreements between mortal beings concepts of good and evil instead of god-like embodiments of those forces.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1544 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1120 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 877 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1019 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1009 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 945 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 859 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 414 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 834 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 889 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 915 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 838 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1013 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 899 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 854 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 855 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 869 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 871 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 966 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 866 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 866 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 446 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 853 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 444 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 471 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 903 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 814 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 864 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1157 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 878 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 978 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1336 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 926 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 894 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 924 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 991 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 987 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 901 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 832 Views

Reply to Message