Active Users:777 Time:05/08/2025 10:06:45 PM
That's not entirely right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM
It's only logical that there actually must have been one very first Age, immediately after the Creator made the Wheel. Of course, after countless turnings of the Wheel, the names "first Age", "second Age" and so on lost their meaning a bit, since you could also call them the 1081. Age and the 1082. Age (or whatever would fit, if you count all Ages that ever occurred). However, since the particular Ages basically always have the same activity, it makes sense to name them always from 1st Age to 7th Age and not continuously increase the numbers in the names of the Ages or change the particular numbers of the Ages (at least from the PoV from an omniscient narrator).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/04/2010 at 03:56:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1405 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1010 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 777 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 887 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 851 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 818 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 748 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 358 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 724 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 776 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 802 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 730 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 898 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 784 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 721 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 761 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 752 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 746 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 815 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 752 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 765 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 386 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 724 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 365 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 413 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 799 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 708 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 738 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1052 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 751 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 854 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1195 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 776 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 768 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 814 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 888 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 851 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 771 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 720 Views

Reply to Message