Active Users:615 Time:19/03/2026 07:32:27 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Can't be... Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM
Actually, I'm pretty sure the "First age" refers to the current era in real life based on the stories that have been supposedly passed down from the First Age (Mosk and Merk, Queen Elsbet, Anla the Wise Counselor)

Source: http://www.sevenspokes.com/chronology/1st.html


Because according to RJ, our "myths" like King Arthur or the stories from the bible are basically the plot of the story in the books.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1571 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... GateKeeper - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1145 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 904 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1038 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... DomA - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1028 Views
Difficult to see how you can refer to a billion people as a "fringe"... *NM* Shannow - 22/04/2010 05:02:08 PM 442 Views
You really think half of all christians believe that Earth is only 3000 years old? *NM* Japhy - 23/04/2010 12:35:01 AM 448 Views
Last I've heard, the majority of Christians weren't fundamentalists DomA - 23/04/2010 01:54:04 PM 878 Views
How about "living on the fringe of reality"? *NM* Marshall - 24/04/2010 10:21:17 PM 446 Views
That's not entirely right Etzel - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 968 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 874 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 417 Views
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 859 Views
No, the point is... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 919 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 940 Views
The question is... Etzel - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 857 Views
I agree with FT RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1037 Views
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 921 Views
Doesn't make sense Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 869 Views
Why? Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 879 Views
Ok File Leader - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 891 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 889 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 985 Views
Yeah... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 881 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 890 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 451 Views
Yes and no... Fanatic-Templar - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 876 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* Etzel - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 457 Views
True that. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 480 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 922 Views
More change? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 835 Views
Re: More change? Kieran - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 890 Views
On the Ages... Etzel - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1180 Views
Re: On the Ages... Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 897 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1003 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... ursidae - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1363 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... gjjfh - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 951 Views
Can't be... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 911 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 949 Views
It's reversed... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1011 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1010 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 922 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 853 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes