Active Users:1720 Time:03/05/2026 03:57:07 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1615 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1174 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 945 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1068 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1068 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1005 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 911 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 435 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 893 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 960 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 977 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 888 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1079 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 957 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 906 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 913 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 927 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 928 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1018 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 914 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 935 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 465 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 912 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 471 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 498 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 966 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 866 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 937 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1216 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 939 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1045 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1408 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 985 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 947 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 985 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1047 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1045 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 965 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 883 Views

Reply to Message