Active Users:1434 Time:19/10/2025 03:56:27 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1445 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1042 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 809 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 922 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 901 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 846 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 777 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 378 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 758 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 799 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 833 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 762 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 925 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 811 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 752 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 789 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 784 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 771 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 861 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 785 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 794 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 405 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 743 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 388 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 429 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 830 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 734 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 770 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1076 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 777 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 884 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1237 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 805 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 794 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 846 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 910 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 902 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 801 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 750 Views

Reply to Message