Active Users:622 Time:19/03/2026 07:43:11 AM
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM
I don't think it's such a complicated issue - in this universe the "beginning" is not tied into human conceptions and experiences of time, so having accepted this, I don't think demanding to know what the "First" age would have consisted of. Perhaps if such an Age exists it would have actually been defined as the time when the Creator and the Dark One became two being of opposite polarities and have nothing to do with humans or history, at all.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 26/04/2010 at 04:47:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1572 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1147 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 904 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1038 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1029 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 968 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 875 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 417 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 859 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 919 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 941 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 857 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1038 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 921 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 869 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 879 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 891 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 889 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 986 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 881 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 891 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 451 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 876 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 457 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 481 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 923 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 835 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 890 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1181 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 897 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1003 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1364 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 951 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 911 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 949 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1011 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1010 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 923 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 854 Views

Reply to Message