Active Users:468 Time:03/05/2025 03:30:42 AM
Re: Sammael? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM
That wasn't "her plan" - she was ordered to capture Rand and not to harm him.


Fair enough, if she didn't actually have much good choices in order to capture Rand, but it was clear that this plan was bound to fail. Even if she hadn't been revealed, Rand had an army nearby, some of them bonded to members of Rand's group who could have reinforced him instantly. There was no way Semirhage was going to succeed.

As for her "stupidity" to torture Rand when she had the chance and despite orders, that's not really stupidity nor incompetence. She's a psychopath and a sadist who on top of it had been seriously humiliated by Rand's people - not a good cocktail. It's Shaidar Haran who underestimated Semirhage's pulsions and overestimated her reliability in such a situation. Any psychiatrist could have told SH Semirhage couldn't be trusted to handle this mission and he better keep an eye on it (which actually, it appears he did. Rand didn't get sudden access to the TP by sheer luck)


I actually think that Shai'tan intended to sacrifice Semirhage there. But what you're saying doesn't make Semirhage's actions more competent, it just means that they were true to her character.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 29/04/2010 07:09:22 AM 1658 Views
Sammael? - 29/04/2010 08:07:24 AM 881 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 01:44:35 PM 707 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 02:50:07 PM 715 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 04:27:54 PM 786 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 05:35:03 PM 785 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM 620 Views
Sincerest apologies, the post should've been a reply... - 29/04/2010 06:52:23 PM 688 Views
Don't sweat it. It's not like we're overflowing with threads and need to cut down on the clutter. *NM* - 30/04/2010 01:52:37 AM 322 Views
Thanks for the support! =) *NM* - 01/05/2010 03:01:25 AM 288 Views
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks - 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM 681 Views
I agree - 29/04/2010 02:56:55 PM 645 Views
Jordan didn't care in a 4 book series! - 29/04/2010 07:24:24 PM 758 Views
Name one bit of good nature to any of the AoL lives of the Forsaken. - 30/04/2010 01:49:53 AM 650 Views
What about Demandred? - 30/04/2010 05:12:55 AM 771 Views
D'oh! How come I didn't immediately think of a politician? Seriously? - 30/04/2010 12:45:35 PM 812 Views
What is your argument? - 30/04/2010 06:12:24 PM 673 Views
Indeed - 01/05/2010 09:35:06 AM 707 Views
Except LTT DID do good. You know, saving the world from the Dark One and all. He was good. QED - 01/05/2010 05:06:31 PM 641 Views
and Demandred fought the Shadow for half the war... what's the point? - 01/05/2010 09:20:00 PM 709 Views
You can do good without being good. It's mostly the system's fault (credit? ) - 01/05/2010 11:30:16 PM 672 Views
How do you judge people, if not by their actions? - 02/05/2010 06:29:16 AM 708 Views
Hair, taste in clothes, and sense of humor. Faile wins! *NM* - 02/05/2010 06:38:08 AM 294 Views
Faile has bad hair *NM* - 03/05/2010 05:06:23 AM 289 Views
To some extent, there was no evil since they lived in Utopia, - 30/04/2010 07:08:32 AM 707 Views
The WoT does NOT feature a "small set of characters" - 03/05/2010 12:06:56 AM 611 Views
I kinda thought most of those points were in what I already wrote - 03/05/2010 02:53:04 AM 590 Views
Re: Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 30/04/2010 02:44:06 AM 643 Views
I agree with a few of your points - 30/04/2010 07:24:59 AM 694 Views
Re: I agree with a few of your points - 01/05/2010 01:13:03 AM 990 Views
someone recently posted audio to the Budapest? signing RJ did - 01/05/2010 03:00:56 AM 620 Views

Reply to Message