That wasn't "her plan" - she was ordered to capture Rand and not to harm him.
Fair enough, if she didn't actually have much good choices in order to capture Rand, but it was clear that this plan was bound to fail. Even if she hadn't been revealed, Rand had an army nearby, some of them bonded to members of Rand's group who could have reinforced him instantly. There was no way Semirhage was going to succeed.
As for her "stupidity" to torture Rand when she had the chance and despite orders, that's not really stupidity nor incompetence. She's a psychopath and a sadist who on top of it had been seriously humiliated by Rand's people - not a good cocktail. It's Shaidar Haran who underestimated Semirhage's pulsions and overestimated her reliability in such a situation. Any psychiatrist could have told SH Semirhage couldn't be trusted to handle this mission and he better keep an eye on it (which actually, it appears he did. Rand didn't get sudden access to the TP by sheer luck)
I actually think that Shai'tan intended to sacrifice Semirhage there. But what you're saying doesn't make Semirhage's actions more competent, it just means that they were true to her character.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately...
- 29/04/2010 07:09:22 AM
1933 Views
Sammael?
- 29/04/2010 08:07:24 AM
1007 Views
Re: Sammael?
- 29/04/2010 01:44:35 PM
844 Views
Re: Sammael?
- 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM
726 Views
Sincerest apologies, the post should've been a reply...
- 29/04/2010 06:52:23 PM
830 Views
Don't sweat it. It's not like we're overflowing with threads and need to cut down on the clutter. *NM*
- 30/04/2010 01:52:37 AM
372 Views
Posting a reply at the bottom of a long thread is a good way for your points to be overlooked. *NM*
- 30/04/2010 01:51:55 AM
386 Views
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks
- 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM
785 Views
Re: Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks
- 29/04/2010 05:04:56 PM
933 Views
Re: Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks
- 29/04/2010 06:05:40 PM
761 Views
Sorry - vanished-portal-deaths are like "Dead! His car fell in the river; we never found the body.." *NM*
- 29/04/2010 07:28:40 PM
385 Views
I was hoping the melting gateway meant they were burned out of existence at first. *NM*
- 29/04/2010 08:10:16 PM
326 Views
Jordan didn't care in a 4 book series!
- 29/04/2010 07:24:24 PM
886 Views
Name one bit of good nature to any of the AoL lives of the Forsaken.
- 30/04/2010 01:49:53 AM
749 Views
What about Demandred?
- 30/04/2010 05:12:55 AM
886 Views
D'oh! How come I didn't immediately think of a politician? Seriously?
- 30/04/2010 12:45:35 PM
914 Views
What is your argument?
- 30/04/2010 06:12:24 PM
796 Views
Indeed
- 01/05/2010 09:35:06 AM
823 Views
Except LTT DID do good. You know, saving the world from the Dark One and all. He was good. QED
- 01/05/2010 05:06:31 PM
745 Views
and Demandred fought the Shadow for half the war... what's the point?
- 01/05/2010 09:20:00 PM
830 Views
You can do good without being good. It's mostly the system's fault (credit? )
- 01/05/2010 11:30:16 PM
804 Views
How do you judge people, if not by their actions?
- 02/05/2010 06:29:16 AM
824 Views
The WoT does NOT feature a "small set of characters"
- 03/05/2010 12:06:56 AM
712 Views
I kinda thought most of those points were in what I already wrote
- 03/05/2010 02:53:04 AM
703 Views
Re: Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately...
- 30/04/2010 02:44:06 AM
750 Views
I agree with a few of your points
- 30/04/2010 07:24:59 AM
807 Views