Active Users:889 Time:02/11/2025 06:27:01 PM
Re: Sammael? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM
That wasn't "her plan" - she was ordered to capture Rand and not to harm him.


Fair enough, if she didn't actually have much good choices in order to capture Rand, but it was clear that this plan was bound to fail. Even if she hadn't been revealed, Rand had an army nearby, some of them bonded to members of Rand's group who could have reinforced him instantly. There was no way Semirhage was going to succeed.

As for her "stupidity" to torture Rand when she had the chance and despite orders, that's not really stupidity nor incompetence. She's a psychopath and a sadist who on top of it had been seriously humiliated by Rand's people - not a good cocktail. It's Shaidar Haran who underestimated Semirhage's pulsions and overestimated her reliability in such a situation. Any psychiatrist could have told SH Semirhage couldn't be trusted to handle this mission and he better keep an eye on it (which actually, it appears he did. Rand didn't get sudden access to the TP by sheer luck)


I actually think that Shai'tan intended to sacrifice Semirhage there. But what you're saying doesn't make Semirhage's actions more competent, it just means that they were true to her character.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 29/04/2010 07:09:22 AM 1762 Views
Sammael? - 29/04/2010 08:07:24 AM 960 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 01:44:35 PM 781 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 02:50:07 PM 787 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 04:27:54 PM 868 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 05:35:03 PM 841 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM 683 Views
Sincerest apologies, the post should've been a reply... - 29/04/2010 06:52:23 PM 772 Views
Don't sweat it. It's not like we're overflowing with threads and need to cut down on the clutter. *NM* - 30/04/2010 01:52:37 AM 355 Views
Thanks for the support! =) *NM* - 01/05/2010 03:01:25 AM 315 Views
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks - 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM 738 Views
I agree - 29/04/2010 02:56:55 PM 707 Views
Jordan didn't care in a 4 book series! - 29/04/2010 07:24:24 PM 835 Views
Name one bit of good nature to any of the AoL lives of the Forsaken. - 30/04/2010 01:49:53 AM 707 Views
What about Demandred? - 30/04/2010 05:12:55 AM 833 Views
D'oh! How come I didn't immediately think of a politician? Seriously? - 30/04/2010 12:45:35 PM 867 Views
What is your argument? - 30/04/2010 06:12:24 PM 750 Views
Indeed - 01/05/2010 09:35:06 AM 771 Views
Except LTT DID do good. You know, saving the world from the Dark One and all. He was good. QED - 01/05/2010 05:06:31 PM 706 Views
and Demandred fought the Shadow for half the war... what's the point? - 01/05/2010 09:20:00 PM 777 Views
You can do good without being good. It's mostly the system's fault (credit? ) - 01/05/2010 11:30:16 PM 746 Views
How do you judge people, if not by their actions? - 02/05/2010 06:29:16 AM 770 Views
Hair, taste in clothes, and sense of humor. Faile wins! *NM* - 02/05/2010 06:38:08 AM 330 Views
Faile has bad hair *NM* - 03/05/2010 05:06:23 AM 314 Views
To some extent, there was no evil since they lived in Utopia, - 30/04/2010 07:08:32 AM 757 Views
The WoT does NOT feature a "small set of characters" - 03/05/2010 12:06:56 AM 667 Views
I kinda thought most of those points were in what I already wrote - 03/05/2010 02:53:04 AM 654 Views
Re: Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 30/04/2010 02:44:06 AM 701 Views
I agree with a few of your points - 30/04/2010 07:24:59 AM 752 Views
Re: I agree with a few of your points - 01/05/2010 01:13:03 AM 1047 Views
someone recently posted audio to the Budapest? signing RJ did - 01/05/2010 03:00:56 AM 673 Views

Reply to Message