Active Users:617 Time:04/08/2025 03:09:40 AM
Re: But... DomA Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM
How can the unseen foe be Slayer, if Slayer is explicitely mentioned one sentence before as one of the specters, who hunt Perrin?


I agree. That'd be repeating Slayer twice (almost in a row), and in the context it's clear Harriet want the "unseen threat" to be mysterious, so it wouldn't have done at all to remind us of Slayer right before if that was him.

I don't think "unseen" implies TAR necessarily either. To me in the context I think it implies Perrin isn't aware of the threat, or he can't find the source.

The way Harriet chose to mention Slayer along the wolves, it sounds like it's the fact Slayer is killing wolves that Perrin will have to deal with.

The only thing remotely interesting is that if Slayer tries to scout Perrin's camp as "Lord Luc" he's making a big mistake, with Basel "I worship the Andoran Royalty" Gill, Lini Eltring and Morgase there. They would know he's Luc Mantear right away. Perhaps Galad too, though he must have been really young when Luc vanished.
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2223 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 936 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1274 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 338 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 778 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 893 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 861 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 899 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 962 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 324 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 728 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 872 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 1004 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 389 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 936 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 973 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 1005 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 746 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 1025 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 768 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 972 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 370 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 331 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 776 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 797 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 867 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 345 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 738 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 760 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 967 Views

Reply to Message