Active Users:345 Time:17/06/2025 05:03:40 PM
Re: But... DomA Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM
How can the unseen foe be Slayer, if Slayer is explicitely mentioned one sentence before as one of the specters, who hunt Perrin?


I agree. That'd be repeating Slayer twice (almost in a row), and in the context it's clear Harriet want the "unseen threat" to be mysterious, so it wouldn't have done at all to remind us of Slayer right before if that was him.

I don't think "unseen" implies TAR necessarily either. To me in the context I think it implies Perrin isn't aware of the threat, or he can't find the source.

The way Harriet chose to mention Slayer along the wolves, it sounds like it's the fact Slayer is killing wolves that Perrin will have to deal with.

The only thing remotely interesting is that if Slayer tries to scout Perrin's camp as "Lord Luc" he's making a big mistake, with Basel "I worship the Andoran Royalty" Gill, Lini Eltring and Morgase there. They would know he's Luc Mantear right away. Perhaps Galad too, though he must have been really young when Luc vanished.
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2205 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 921 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1258 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 327 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 762 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 875 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 845 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 884 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 945 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 312 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 712 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 854 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 984 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 380 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 922 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 959 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 986 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 729 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 1006 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 746 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 954 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 360 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 321 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 759 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 778 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 848 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 335 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 722 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 744 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 947 Views

Reply to Message