But we didn't know about the TP for a long time after Ishy's death. All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?
But of course we had clues concerning the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named yet.
For your theory to be true the TP is intrinsic to Slayer being the killer. No True Power connection "anchoring" Ishamael to ST, no way Asmodean's soul was beyond the reach of ST.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1540 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1143 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1158 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1121 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
911 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
997 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
962 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
943 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
1015 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
984 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
903 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
872 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
433 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
890 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
394 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
928 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
406 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
851 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
915 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
878 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
819 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
936 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
836 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
852 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
1034 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
1024 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
448 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1087 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
925 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
924 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
930 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
950 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
875 Views
Re: I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:24:44 PM
1002 Views
