RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1450 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1063 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1077 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1038 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
839 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
920 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
884 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
861 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
937 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
917 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
838 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
791 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
398 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
819 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
360 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
860 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
370 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
787 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
845 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
813 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
752 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
859 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
748 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
764 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
941 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
934 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
414 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1004 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
858 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
852 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
850 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
872 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
807 Views