Active Users:2528 Time:03/05/2026 10:36:04 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But your theory completely relies on this thought darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.


I'm not confusing the two points, it's just that if you want your theory to hold water, all the elements that go into it MUST be "intuitively obvious" at the time of Asmo's death. The manner and place of his death are an important clue to the identity of Asmo's killer.

Regardless of this point, I still say the scene itself refutes your accounting of Asmo's death and certainly the way you describe this is not intuitively obvious. Why would the reader have any reason to think Asmo died in TAR? We don't even know how Slayer enters TAR at this time in the series as his scenes in the Two Rivers make if vague, even after his wounding he goes back to where his body was last seen before he reappears.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. Tom - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1431 Views
It's unlikely Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 1050 Views
Re: It's unlikely DomA - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 1060 Views
Well... Etzel - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 1017 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 821 Views
Re: A few points Etzel - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 904 Views
Re: A few points darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 869 Views
Re: A few points DomA - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 849 Views
Actually I believe... Etzel - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 917 Views
Re: Actually I believe... darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 900 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 825 Views
Re: I think... darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 780 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 387 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 804 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 352 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 844 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 362 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 771 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 824 Views
That doesn't make sense darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 789 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 736 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 836 Views
You confuse two things... Etzel - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 731 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 749 Views
I argue... Etzel - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 919 Views
we don't know any of that until WH darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 918 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... Etzel - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 778 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 830 Views
Thanks! darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 809 Views
Re: A few points Etzel - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 884 Views
I think you are grasping a little darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 865 Views
Re: Well... DomA - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 892 Views
I know... Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 859 Views
Re: I know... DomA - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 745 Views
Re: I know... Etzel - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 913 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM 407 Views
graendal Foxhead - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 758 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others... DomA - 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM 986 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 844 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 833 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 827 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick DomA - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 851 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) RugbyPlayingAshaman - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 784 Views
Re: I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien DomA - 26/05/2010 02:24:44 PM 912 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think newyorkersedai - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 819 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* aldapelan - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 400 Views
I agree Camilla - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 1069 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes