"All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?"
It's interesting that you are allowed to take the main clues from LoC, though.
Anyway, we had this discussion often enough and I doubt we will find a consensus. Let us just wait & see!
It's interesting that you are allowed to take the main clues from LoC, though.
Anyway, we had this discussion often enough and I doubt we will find a consensus. Let us just wait & see!
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1474 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1088 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1096 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1060 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
858 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
941 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
911 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
883 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
958 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
936 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
859 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
817 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
409 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
841 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
369 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
880 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
380 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
806 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
866 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
827 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
769 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
879 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
770 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
793 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
966 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
963 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above...
- 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM
827 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
422 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1031 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
879 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
872 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
875 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
894 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
829 Views