RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1400 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1027 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1034 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1000 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
798 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
879 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
849 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
823 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
886 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
876 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
802 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
745 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
381 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
784 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
342 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
814 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
353 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
752 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
807 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
767 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
709 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
818 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
714 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
726 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
895 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
895 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
394 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
962 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
817 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
812 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
808 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
824 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
762 Views