Active Users:674 Time:23/03/2026 06:58:00 AM
Fain and Slayer RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 08:47:48 PM
Fain is probably just hunted by the Super Darkhound Pack (and likely Slayer) and will be killed soon (this scene will probably told by Slayer, who will then reveal that he killed the traitor Asmo as well). Fain's wildcard role is played, IMO. To give Fain yet another power base that late in the story doesn't make much sense.


Seems doubtful to me. RJ didn't initially envision revealing Asmo's killer in the books, and this scene would strike me as too obvious a possibility that he would have had to disregard. I also can't imagine Mordeth's role as a third force or a Rand-Fain confrontation of some sort, built up since TEotW, not playing a role in the Last Battle.

I'm not sure what having Slayer dust Fain off would accomplish more generally. If anything, it would resemble a certain scene in the last Dark Tower book that I and many other readers found unconvincing (which isn't to say that it couldn't work just as unconvincingly in this series, of course).

Reply to message
If Demandred isn't Roedran (or controlling Roedran) - 07/07/2010 10:08:19 AM 1731 Views
Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:31:33 AM 806 Views
Re: Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:46:31 AM 665 Views
Yeah... - 07/07/2010 11:03:21 AM 710 Views
Re: Yeah... - 07/07/2010 12:58:04 PM 813 Views
The thing is... - 07/07/2010 01:30:11 PM 643 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 03:24:34 PM 560 Views
As said... - 07/07/2010 03:56:20 PM 608 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 04:27:11 PM 560 Views
I think - 08/07/2010 09:00:46 AM 683 Views
It all began.... - 07/07/2010 11:49:39 AM 867 Views
The idea is... - 07/07/2010 12:39:19 PM 657 Views
No, Etzel... - 07/07/2010 01:03:20 PM 697 Views
I disagree... - 07/07/2010 01:18:11 PM 619 Views
And besides... - 07/07/2010 01:49:04 PM 619 Views
Fain and Slayer - 07/07/2010 08:47:48 PM 599 Views
Fain playing a significant role in the LB would too much allude to LotR, IMO. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:28:29 PM 588 Views
As would Moiraine returning. - 08/07/2010 02:13:25 AM 659 Views
It depends on Fain's role... - 08/07/2010 08:34:27 AM 512 Views
But what does "wildcard" really mean? - 08/07/2010 03:19:16 PM 535 Views
for a long time i thought shara and their tattooed channeles. - 09/07/2010 05:24:16 PM 528 Views
Fain doesn't make sense from a timing stand point - 07/07/2010 04:46:00 PM 574 Views
Indeed... - 08/07/2010 08:42:45 AM 538 Views
agreed - 09/07/2010 05:56:23 PM 488 Views
One reason the Murandy-New SL theory makes sense... - 07/07/2010 07:19:56 PM 529 Views
That's most likely just coincidence. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:30:00 PM 250 Views
Riiiight... because WoT is chock full of coincidences. - 08/07/2010 02:12:47 AM 514 Views
In any case... - 08/07/2010 08:31:19 AM 551 Views
Re: That's most likely just coincidence. - 08/07/2010 02:13:36 AM 529 Views
They followed Fain all the way to Caemlyn and shot arrows at Rand - 08/07/2010 04:21:14 AM 508 Views
Yeah, I agree, Roedran isn't under Fain's control. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:38:15 AM 344 Views
Re: It all began.... - 08/07/2010 12:11:02 PM 521 Views
Murandy just doesn't fit Demandred. Also, Sammael could have been wrong. - 07/07/2010 07:57:19 PM 801 Views
Here's another possibility - 08/07/2010 02:21:25 AM 605 Views
Another possibility for Demandred - 08/07/2010 03:20:27 AM 515 Views
What if Demandred's base is... - 08/07/2010 04:52:40 AM 550 Views
my problem with this - 08/07/2010 04:59:35 AM 535 Views
Well, I tend to agree with you - 09/07/2010 12:27:04 AM 489 Views
I doubt that you could that easily control the Madmen. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:44:42 AM 231 Views
Unlikely... maybe even impossible - 08/07/2010 10:14:24 AM 529 Views
Definitely possible. - 08/07/2010 02:06:57 PM 530 Views
Now here's a man with... vision! - 09/07/2010 12:24:13 AM 506 Views
not really - 10/07/2010 12:25:31 PM 501 Views
That's factually incorrect - 12/07/2010 12:41:48 AM 561 Views
yes, factually incorrect by you - 12/07/2010 08:02:23 AM 585 Views
- 12/07/2010 04:40:45 PM 514 Views
I think Lanfears' estimation is incorrect. - 13/07/2010 04:15:44 PM 516 Views

Reply to Message