Active Users:1791 Time:01/05/2026 07:45:24 PM
Re: I don't think DomA Send a noteboard - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM
Mesaana could have channelled a protective layer (like gloves) not to touch directly the OR. It's theorically possible, but she would have been surrounded by sisters looking closely at what she was doing (and ready to shield her if she failed the test).


She could easily have woven the barrier before the testing, say when she was alone in her rooms or something. With an inverted weave, no one would have known at all.


That is not what I meant. It's not the weave that would be visible, it's the barrier of air.

I'm not convinced Mesaana could manipulate an object naturally if there's a barrier of air standing between it and her hands, and there would be many sisters looking at her closely. We haven't seen anything like a malleable barrier of air being woven before, like a skin/a glove. All barriers of air we have seen were solid/unbreakable. Mesaana could not move her hands if she surrounded them with air.

The AOL AS trusted the Binder as a judiciary tool, so it's really not obvious it can be beaten at all (and we're a bit at a loss to guess how, because we don't know for sure what the OR does. It seems to work as a kind of compulsion, but there's no visible weave).

I'm not sure what Brandon said has to be taken so literally either (by "defeating the OR" did he meant the rod itself, or the test with the OR Egwene imposed on all sisters? With RJ we'd know pretty much it's the former, but Brandon uses odd/ambiguous formulations often enough). Avoiding to swear the Oaths on the Binder is the most obvious way to beat it, and I think the difference between doing this by managing not to touch the Binder or sending someone else to swear for you (ie: a non-BA Mesaana then killed) is splitting hair. The net result is that you fool the AS into believing you're bound when you're not, and in neither case you really "beat the OR" literally.
This message last edited by DomA on 18/07/2010 at 06:19:56 PM
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 4054 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1173 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 1038 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1153 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1451 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1102 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1107 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1156 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 606 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1117 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 1079 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 1031 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 935 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 961 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1238 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 991 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 973 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 940 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1107 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1171 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 1025 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 1015 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 954 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 1034 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 1055 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 900 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1214 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 906 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 1065 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 990 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 1047 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 1028 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 511 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 865 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 1062 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 979 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1156 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 912 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 975 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 1093 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 970 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1417 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 1005 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 1011 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 988 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1353 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 952 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 1031 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 892 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 878 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 878 Views

Reply to Message