Would then e.g. Moridin as SH spy on Sammael and Graendal in ACoS, ch.40, or SH free Semirhage, though he is quite limited in this persona. Makes no sense.
The SH persona is probably also linked to the DO. Moridin is becoming a tool.
We also see in ACoS, ch.25, that SH tortures Moghedien and then sends her to Moridin. This makes pretty clear that both can't be the same creature. They couldn't switch places and clothes that quickly.
That chapter was quite, well, metaphysical. It sounded like it happened in T'A'R. So it would be quite possible. Moridin's 'Darker Half' does the torture and the more human half becomes Moghedien's master.
Ultimately, I don't see the sense in fusing Moridin and SH together. It makes more sense that the DO could simply project his shadowy from into SH and this explains his powers/limitations. Moridin is simply the Forsaken, who is most dedicated to the DO and whom the DO trusts most, and therefore SH and Moridin are closely working together.
I would also think that Rand would notice a further direct link to SH, because of the balefire link to Moridin.
I would also think that Rand would notice a further direct link to SH, because of the balefire link to Moridin.
Rand doesn't know about SH.
In terms of channeling, there are a number of people that believe Moridin is either burnt out or received a body which is unable to channel (hence excessive use of the TP and the DO's trust in him). This fits with the nature of SH.
I don't think there is more than a little evidence for this, but there's enough to at least consider that it's possible.
Moridin & Shadar Haran
- 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
1785 Views
No...
- 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
1168 Views
Re: No...
- 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
1064 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
1010 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
867 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
- 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
1086 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
- 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
953 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
- 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
1346 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
- 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
1068 Views
Au contraire.
- 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
1181 Views
But why...
- 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
999 Views
Re: But why...
- 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM
1073 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
- 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
1077 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
- 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
1020 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
- 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
1118 Views
Um not quite
- 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
971 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
- 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
926 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
1047 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1027 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
977 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
1015 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
896 Views
The problem is...
- 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
860 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
- 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
966 Views
I already answered all this...
- 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
980 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
- 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
1085 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
- 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
1019 Views
No problem
- 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
1054 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
- 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
1126 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
- 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
962 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
- 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
1037 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
- 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
990 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
963 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
853 Views
One should also remember...
- 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
886 Views
Eh?
- 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
906 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
- 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
957 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
- 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
991 Views

*NM*
=
- Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela?