Active Users:872 Time:17/02/2026 01:16:10 PM
Re: But why... Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM
Would then e.g. Moridin as SH spy on Sammael and Graendal in ACoS, ch.40, or SH free Semirhage, though he is quite limited in this persona. Makes no sense.


The SH persona is probably also linked to the DO. Moridin is becoming a tool.

We also see in ACoS, ch.25, that SH tortures Moghedien and then sends her to Moridin. This makes pretty clear that both can't be the same creature. They couldn't switch places and clothes that quickly.


That chapter was quite, well, metaphysical. It sounded like it happened in T'A'R. So it would be quite possible. Moridin's 'Darker Half' does the torture and the more human half becomes Moghedien's master.

Ultimately, I don't see the sense in fusing Moridin and SH together. It makes more sense that the DO could simply project his shadowy from into SH and this explains his powers/limitations. Moridin is simply the Forsaken, who is most dedicated to the DO and whom the DO trusts most, and therefore SH and Moridin are closely working together.

I would also think that Rand would notice a further direct link to SH, because of the balefire link to Moridin.


Rand doesn't know about SH.

In terms of channeling, there are a number of people that believe Moridin is either burnt out or received a body which is unable to channel (hence excessive use of the TP and the DO's trust in him). This fits with the nature of SH.

I don't think there is more than a little evidence for this, but there's enough to at least consider that it's possible.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1882 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1261 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1148 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1154 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1269 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1103 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1414 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1133 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1263 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1075 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1170 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1176 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1103 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1193 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1042 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1416 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1415 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1020 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1122 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1106 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1052 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1087 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 980 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 942 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1041 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1060 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1158 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1004 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1126 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1084 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1142 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1042 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 570 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1199 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1045 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1112 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1056 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1004 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 915 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1151 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1040 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 916 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 932 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 962 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 981 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1051 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1073 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 884 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1098 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 998 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 906 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1143 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1014 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 944 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1202 Views

Reply to Message