Active Users:889 Time:17/02/2026 01:19:10 PM
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.


As far as we know, SH 0.5. was at some point disposed of. Later, apparently when Ishy wasn't already transmigrated, the DO managed to get it right.

2: Explain to me how the Watcher could be Moridin when The Watcher "ghosted soundlesly through the trees", following two very experienced channelers holding the Source (thus having heightened senses) in a leafless forest at noon, littered with brown leaves where those two channelers stumble around to just to keep their balance. (ACoS - Patterns within Patterns)


Moridin is wearing fancloth as the watcher, and it is pointed out that the watcher is sneaking. SH wouldn't need that, he can lurk in the shadows. SH also doesn't have eyebrows and eyes, contrary to the watcher, as it is explicitely mentioned.

3: Explain to me if the Watcher is Moridin how he noticed that(apparently from some distance) Sammy had let the link between himself and Granny dissolve? Note that the Watcher also knew that both Sammy and Granny still held on to the Source.


Moridin can sense saidin and see it glow around Sammael. The typical "prickling" tells him about saidar, as it is explicitely mentioned.

4: How could the Watcher tell Sammy held the Source in the first place, given the Watcher was following the deadly duo by Grandaels easy-to-follow shiny red dress (indicating a fairly big distance).


The watcher obviously wasn't that far away.

If you compare the watcher's PoV with others from Moridin, it's absolutely clear that Moridin is the watcher. It can't be SH, because SH doesn't have eyes & eyebrows, doesn't need fancloth and isn't that aware of the OP.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1882 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1262 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1149 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1155 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1270 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1104 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1414 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1133 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1263 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1075 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1170 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1177 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1104 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1194 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1042 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1417 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1415 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1021 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1123 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1107 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1052 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1087 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 981 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 942 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1042 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1061 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1159 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1005 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1127 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1085 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1143 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1043 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 570 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1200 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1045 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1113 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1057 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1005 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 916 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1151 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1041 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 916 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 933 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 963 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 982 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1051 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1073 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 885 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1098 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 998 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 907 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1144 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1015 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 945 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1203 Views

Reply to Message