Active Users:931 Time:14/11/2026 06:51:52 AM
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
Between Luc/Isam and Moridin/SH. There is no concrete evidence that Moridin and SH are basically one creature and can change their form.

Like it is implied in the books and directly told by the authors, SH is basically an incarnation of the DO in the real world, while Moridin is the most trusted Forsaken. This explains why Moridin and SH are closely working together. Nothing suggests that RJ was trying to fool us about SH's or Moridin's nature.

For example the following report doesn't make much sense, if this theory were right:
"Brandon hinted at some severe limitations on Shaidar Haran to affect the physical world. He says that a lot of actions that people assume to be those of Shaidar Haran in the book in one particular scene were physically carried out by Elza. He further indicated that Shadar Haran would have been incapable of physically placing the collar himself."

SH could simply switch to his Moridin persona to circumvent such limitations to affect the physical world, since Moridin obviously can affect the physical world with no problems. But SH can't do that, because Moridin is someone else.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 2033 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1422 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1307 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1314 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1423 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1258 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1601 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1298 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1438 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1246 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1343 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1347 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1262 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1347 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1192 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1602 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1588 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1181 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1277 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1276 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1226 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1253 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1133 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 1085 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1210 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1267 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1312 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1149 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1275 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1250 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1299 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1200 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 652 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1346 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1195 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1265 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1226 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1189 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 1128 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1330 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1209 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 1072 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 1081 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 1118 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1148 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1236 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1234 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 1038 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1256 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1188 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 1048 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1295 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1174 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 1116 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1366 Views

Reply to Message