Active Users:537 Time:01/06/2026 05:52:02 PM
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
Between Luc/Isam and Moridin/SH. There is no concrete evidence that Moridin and SH are basically one creature and can change their form.

Like it is implied in the books and directly told by the authors, SH is basically an incarnation of the DO in the real world, while Moridin is the most trusted Forsaken. This explains why Moridin and SH are closely working together. Nothing suggests that RJ was trying to fool us about SH's or Moridin's nature.

For example the following report doesn't make much sense, if this theory were right:
"Brandon hinted at some severe limitations on Shaidar Haran to affect the physical world. He says that a lot of actions that people assume to be those of Shaidar Haran in the book in one particular scene were physically carried out by Elza. He further indicated that Shadar Haran would have been incapable of physically placing the collar himself."

SH could simply switch to his Moridin persona to circumvent such limitations to affect the physical world, since Moridin obviously can affect the physical world with no problems. But SH can't do that, because Moridin is someone else.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1931 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1319 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1211 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1217 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1334 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1159 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1486 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1184 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1334 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1147 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1230 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1242 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1165 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1249 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1094 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1485 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1471 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1079 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1184 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1167 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1118 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1151 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1043 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 989 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1100 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1118 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1214 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1054 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1187 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1148 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1193 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1104 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 596 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1253 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1098 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1171 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1114 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1061 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 984 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1222 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1100 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 977 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 984 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 1018 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1043 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1109 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1129 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 942 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1161 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1057 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 956 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1205 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1072 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 1004 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1260 Views

Reply to Message