You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Moridin & Shadar Haran
- 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
1884 Views
No...
- 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
1263 Views
Re: No...
- 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
1150 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
1093 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
956 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
- 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
1156 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
- 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
1019 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
- 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
1414 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
- 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
1133 Views
Au contraire.
- 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
1263 Views
But why...
- 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
1077 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
- 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
1178 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
- 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
1105 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
- 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
1195 Views
Um not quite
- 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
1042 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
- 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
1022 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
1125 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1109 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
1054 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
1088 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
983 Views
The problem is...
- 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
944 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
- 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
1044 Views
I already answered all this...
- 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
1063 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
- 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
1160 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
- 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
1086 Views
No problem
- 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
1144 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
- 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
1201 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
- 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
1046 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
- 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
1115 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
- 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
1060 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
1042 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
916 Views
One should also remember...
- 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
965 Views
Eh?
- 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
983 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
- 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
1052 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
- 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
1073 Views

*NM*
=
- Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela?