Active Users:462 Time:18/06/2025 07:26:57 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter.
You just read the books any way you want man. All fine and dandy by me. It's just books anyway.

For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.
Maybe "For some reason" means these people have a piont?
Heck, if you would have read my first post better in this thread, you'd see I think Taims body was used for the Transmigration, so I guess I think so too!
It's just the way I read the books. I'm just a fan, loving the story. Same like you.

In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.
Well. No. I'll have you know I don't give a rats arse about internet-glory, if it even exists. It's a meaningless and fleeting contact you and I have (no offence).

I'm a 34 y/o engineer with a wife and 2 little kids. I'm having 4 weeks off while my wife works the first 1 and saw this topic come along. 99% of the time I'm just reading the threads and I don't even have time or even feel like responing.
What can I win for the "most original theory"? Nothing. I couldn't care less about it. Does it put bread on my shelve or something? I saw this topic/ your first post.. and on a whim, I decided to just write my perspective.

Heck. I've been reading the story I'm trying to show you ever since '94 (when I re-read the Eye for the first time -again on holiday- hehe). If I would have wanted to "invent theories", I would have done it earlier, wouldn't you think?

Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.
Well. I do, but I won't 'bore' you with the details. You'd all think it bullcrap because you don't read it that way and I'm just out for some non-existant glory on a back-end corner of the Internet. Ha!

I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense.
Well. It hurts a tad that you view it that way, but that's fine. From where you stand, I do see your point. Either way, it's all fine. Once AMoL will be out, we'll know...and we'll probably not even be here.

Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
ONe thing, Etzel. What you view as complicated and convulated, might just be 'cut and dried' to someone else. Ok?

Some people see Patterns within Patterns where others don't even see a pattern in the first place. Even in your -and my- life, you will encounter people who won't see what you think is obvious. *shrugs*
Way of the world I guess.

Cheerio,
Mik -holiday-a-go-gooo-!
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'

Death dances in my footsteps....
This message last edited by Mik on 27/07/2010 at 02:12:35 PM
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1694 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1088 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 983 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 941 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 784 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1009 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 886 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1089 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 936 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1242 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 989 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1097 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 917 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 978 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 986 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 932 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1034 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 892 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1226 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1256 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 854 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 954 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 950 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 896 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 958 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 817 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 777 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 884 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 898 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1000 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 838 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 992 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 927 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 977 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 882 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 480 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1048 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 894 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 964 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 928 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 828 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 780 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 998 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 877 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 770 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 777 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 806 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 830 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 874 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 917 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 723 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 964 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 847 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 775 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1010 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 855 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 747 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1034 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes