Ah, but they only have to find a way around 1 component of any of the Oaths, not all of them or even an 'entire' Oath. The Oath in question specifically gives an exemption for using the Power as a weapon if another Sister's life is in danger. I think that argument can be made for the Sisters already taken by the Seanchan so is justification for 'offensive/first-strike' use of the One Power as a weapon.
Except that the Seanchan consider captured damane to be extremely valuable and as such the lives of captured sisters are infact NOT in danger at all. The Seanchan would keep them alive and healthy as well as they could, just as they would any usefull "tool" (which is what the damane are to the Seanchan).
The freedom/sanity of the captured sisters is in danger yes, but in its current form the oaths care only about their lives. Maybe if an AS could convince herself that being broken and brainwashed by the collar would be a death of sort, then they could claim that the "life" of the sister was in danger. But again this would be the type of mental gymnastic that I suspect few would be capable off.
Personally it would be smartest to just get rid of the oath alltogether, or atleast add an exception for the Seanchan. This exception would keep the people who are AS-positive/neutral happy, but allow unlimited warfare against the Seanchan.
The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
- 03/08/2010 10:32:03 PM
1689 Views
Re: The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
- 03/08/2010 10:53:38 PM
1123 Views
Why not take an oath...
- 04/08/2010 12:09:46 AM
1006 Views
or just adapt the one power as a weapon oath to include a sister's freedom as well as her life
*NM*
- 04/08/2010 01:45:43 AM
428 Views
*NM*
- 04/08/2010 01:45:43 AM
428 Views
Perhaps they would die?
- 04/08/2010 09:10:42 AM
1135 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 04/08/2010 01:43:02 PM
992 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 04/08/2010 07:14:24 PM
864 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 04/08/2010 07:44:10 PM
926 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 05/08/2010 08:33:18 AM
850 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 05/08/2010 01:15:47 PM
857 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 05/08/2010 04:33:25 PM
914 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
- 06/08/2010 12:02:16 AM
912 Views
they can't
- 04/08/2010 12:54:46 AM
1024 Views
Re: they can't
- 04/08/2010 02:27:45 AM
1008 Views
Re: they can't
- 04/08/2010 07:09:45 AM
971 Views
Re: they can't
- 04/08/2010 02:44:10 PM
894 Views
read the oaths again
- 04/08/2010 08:15:24 PM
943 Views
I don't think #1 is as simple as you say.
- 04/08/2010 02:22:25 AM
914 Views
For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
- 04/08/2010 10:59:23 AM
1088 Views
Re: For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
- 05/08/2010 01:17:44 AM
924 Views
I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
- 05/08/2010 08:19:38 PM
863 Views
Re: I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
- 05/08/2010 11:57:43 PM
899 Views
Whoa whoa whoa!
- 06/08/2010 03:07:34 AM
901 Views
I actually think the opposite: the damane would wipe the floor with the BT
- 13/08/2010 11:27:21 PM
917 Views
My thoughts on the damane...
- 05/08/2010 04:11:35 AM
885 Views
How exactly would Egwene learn where the Damane are kept?
- 05/08/2010 07:57:55 PM
1109 Views
Interrogate the Damane.
- 05/08/2010 10:32:17 PM
781 Views
