Active Users:592 Time:03/08/2025 08:05:56 PM
My only theory... Nameless Ashaman Send a noteboard - 20/08/2010 06:02:14 PM
My only theory is that weaves weren't shared due to channelers being isolated from each other or simply mistrusting those they did encounter. Thus knowledge disappeared as the AOL channelers aged and died.

It's still a stretch to believe that Travelling was among the lost weaves, however. It was broadly useful and doesn't seem to require a special talent. You would think every AOL channeler with sufficient strength would have learned it.

As Gher pointed out, making angreals and cuendillar weren't common weaves and probably required a certain aptitude. It's far easier to believe that knowledge could be lost.

Knowledge of Balefire would have been deliberately allowed to die out.

Compulsion wasn't actually lost, just forbidden. Besides, even if the AOL weaves had passed from memory, apparantly half of all wilders figure out some version of it on their own.

So Travelling is the only big mystery, IMO.


Reply to message
How were all these amazing weaves 'lost' ? - 20/08/2010 04:33:43 AM 1773 Views
Ishamael may have had a hand in that... - 20/08/2010 04:45:39 AM 1112 Views
Agreed. - 20/08/2010 10:01:37 AM 1012 Views
Lost Weaves - 20/08/2010 01:43:25 PM 1096 Views
Re: Lost Weaves *NM* - 20/08/2010 01:45:30 PM 534 Views
Not logical - 20/08/2010 01:50:32 PM 1083 Views
Re: Not logical - 20/08/2010 03:22:04 PM 909 Views
All I'm saying, is that Travelling would STILL be a very usefull survival tool during the Breaking.. - 20/08/2010 03:44:59 PM 1035 Views
All good points also. - 20/08/2010 03:48:49 PM 1382 Views
Re: Not logical - 20/08/2010 03:45:55 PM 878 Views
Re: Not logical - 21/08/2010 04:20:41 AM 806 Views
you may have hit onto something with your last statement - 21/08/2010 05:06:59 PM 896 Views
Re: you may have hit onto something with your last statement - 23/08/2010 05:09:06 PM 805 Views
I don't think that creating cuendillar and 'angreals was common knowledge. - 20/08/2010 05:06:20 PM 904 Views
The need to learn a location to travel - 20/08/2010 05:58:48 PM 851 Views
They could use Rand's trick from TGS. - 21/08/2010 01:06:33 AM 810 Views
My only theory... - 20/08/2010 06:02:14 PM 866 Views
The Strongest Died seems like a pretty valid theory to me... - 20/08/2010 06:14:29 PM 1014 Views
Maybe Aes Sedai treated weaves like Intellectual Property - 20/08/2010 09:49:12 PM 834 Views
Trademark? Patent? Or Copyright? =P *NM* - 20/08/2010 10:19:36 PM 373 Views
It doesn't have to be logical... - 20/08/2010 11:50:17 PM 977 Views
Idea? - 21/08/2010 12:47:52 AM 767 Views
But they weren't too weak - 21/08/2010 02:48:43 AM 845 Views
That's because most of the major people in WoT are powerful channelers. - 21/08/2010 04:13:04 AM 931 Views
How can you "write a weave down"? - 21/08/2010 04:54:28 PM 903 Views
How did Moiraine learn balefire then? *NM* - 21/08/2010 05:04:27 PM 1057 Views
figured it out on her own, don't forget that Nyn used it too against the Fades in TDR. *NM* - 21/08/2010 05:12:15 PM 410 Views
That's a stretch - Moiraine never demonstrated any creative talent with the OP... - 21/08/2010 06:15:01 PM 844 Views
OK, I'll buy Vandene teaching it, but not learning it from a written description *NM* - 21/08/2010 06:35:46 PM 417 Views
I myself can't buy Vandene teaching that weave to any Sister - 24/08/2010 04:06:26 PM 871 Views
Me neither... - 24/08/2010 05:50:24 PM 906 Views
Mispost.. *NM* - 25/08/2010 02:51:02 PM 476 Views
I disagree - Moiraine's wilder tricks show that she is quite creative with the OP - 24/08/2010 03:31:06 PM 849 Views
Re: I disagree - Moiraine's wilder tricks show that she is quite creative with the OP - 24/08/2010 05:32:11 PM 1181 Views
But... - 24/08/2010 06:40:39 PM 826 Views
When did she use that? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:34:31 AM 390 Views
We know of her trick with stones and light from 'New Spring' IIRC - 25/08/2010 02:40:26 PM 996 Views
Elayne did use Moiraine's coin trick. - 25/08/2010 06:09:27 PM 951 Views
Likely from Vandene - 21/08/2010 05:58:31 PM 1192 Views
Something no one else is mentioning... that I saw... - 21/08/2010 07:15:49 PM 916 Views
one thing i've noticed - 23/08/2010 06:37:48 PM 857 Views
Simple: none were necessary for survival in Stone Age barbarism. - 23/08/2010 09:12:40 PM 824 Views

Reply to Message