Active Users:840 Time:10/09/2026 06:57:07 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1154 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 862 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 761 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 755 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 766 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 732 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 327 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 720 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 868 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 752 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 724 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 760 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 815 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 795 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 303 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 307 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 344 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 308 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 737 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 821 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 793 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 729 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 732 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 733 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 374 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 745 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 359 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 740 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 764 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes