Active Users:610 Time:30/10/2026 10:23:43 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1175 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 893 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 787 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 777 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 791 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 760 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 337 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 743 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 896 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 775 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 755 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 788 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 842 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 822 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 316 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 320 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 357 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 320 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 763 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 845 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 819 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 757 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 759 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 759 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 386 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 775 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 369 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 769 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 792 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes