Active Users:1488 Time:23/10/2025 10:47:53 PM
Which were their ages before they swore. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM
Seriously though we know that's not the case as Siuan and Leanne both reverted back to "prime child bearing year" when they were Stilled


Would it be the same for someone like Verin, or hell, Cadsuane?
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 1144 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 691 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 861 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 275 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 786 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 841 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 901 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 652 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 605 Views
The answer is very simple. The WT discourages AS from having families as it distracts for being AS - 03/10/2010 01:08:30 AM 628 Views
OTOH, maybe they're all just post-menopausal *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:53:34 AM 289 Views
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM 566 Views
Which were their ages before they swore. - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM 617 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 605 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 645 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 614 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 691 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 264 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 261 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 281 Views

Reply to Message