Active Users:2541 Time:19/06/2026 10:44:46 AM
Really? Healthy? Artsapat Send a noteboard - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM
I think Moraine and Thom could become the healthiest. Also, Loial and Erith (is that how it's spelled?) have a pretty healthy realtionship.


With her and his mother deciding amongst themselves that he should get married? He may agree with it, plus it's their culture, but still it's nowhere near an equal relationship.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 2119 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 574 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 1128 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 1068 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1423 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 1135 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 957 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 1000 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 991 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 1040 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 1097 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 1024 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 975 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 1121 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 1063 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 563 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1331 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 456 Views

Reply to Message