Active Users:1039 Time:02/11/2025 09:12:54 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM

Graendal has trouble releasing the gateway, but I personally think she tied it off and was desperately trying to unravel it in time.

It's also possible that the balefire didn't 'reach' the weave by the time she released it i.e. the rest of the palace was being devoured by balefire and just before it hit her gateway she released it.


The way the text reads seems obvious that she had not tied off the weave and released is a second or two before the BF hit the weave.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 26/10/2010 at 04:40:35 AM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1630 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 459 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* Night Walker - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 438 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM 1026 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM 900 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1086 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* newyorkersedai - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 386 Views
*nods* *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 387 Views
thats not true Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 942 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. TaskmasterJack - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 993 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM 928 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is... TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM 1065 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 919 Views
I don't agree Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 1019 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 995 Views
Re: Balefire TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1074 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 953 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM 1089 Views
A weave should be destroyed Sidious - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 848 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 930 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 792 Views
I agree darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 820 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1092 Views
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 886 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes