Active Users:396 Time:01/05/2025 08:23:20 PM
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM
And we've never seen any indication that balefire removes a weave or flows; that's what slicing and untying weaves are for.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1543 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 413 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 375 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 921 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 341 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 347 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 851 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 825 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 808 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 912 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 901 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 926 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 871 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 748 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 820 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 710 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 734 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 914 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 794 Views

Reply to Message